On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Samuel Pitoiset
samuel.pitoi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/06/2015 02:53 AM, Robert Bragg wrote:
As we've learned more about the observability capabilities of Gen
graphics we've found that it's not enough to only try and configure the
OA unit from userspace
Petri Latval wrote some piglit test for the core
INTEL_performance_query behaviour (i.e not assuming anything about the
semantics of the counters themselves) that he sent to the list some
time last year, but unfortunately they fell through the cracks and
never landed.
The other week I revived
Did you write piglit tests according to what the spec says, btw ?
On 05/06/2015 02:53 AM, Robert Bragg wrote:
As we've learned more about the observability capabilities of Gen
graphics we've found that it's not enough to only try and configure the
OA unit from userspace without any dedicated
On 05/06/2015 02:53 AM, Robert Bragg wrote:
As we've learned more about the observability capabilities of Gen
graphics we've found that it's not enough to only try and configure the
OA unit from userspace without any dedicated support from the kernel.
Hi Robert,
Yeah, this is the same idea
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 10:36:15AM +0200, Samuel Pitoiset wrote:
On 05/06/2015 02:53 AM, Robert Bragg wrote:
As we've learned more about the observability capabilities of Gen
graphics we've found that it's not enough to only try and configure the
OA unit from userspace without any
On 06/05/15 17:02, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 10:36:15AM +0200, Samuel Pitoiset wrote:
On 05/06/2015 02:53 AM, Robert Bragg wrote:
As we've learned more about the observability capabilities of Gen
graphics we've found that it's not enough to only try and configure the
OA
As we've learned more about the observability capabilities of Gen
graphics we've found that it's not enough to only try and configure the
OA unit from userspace without any dedicated support from the kernel.
As it is currently the i965 backends for both AMD_performance_monitor
and
