As Alex said, this is more like : R600/R700* support GL3.3.
* except original R600 (Radeon HD 2900 series).
I don't know if this can be easily added in your tool or it's even
important to say here. But I think this information should be mentioned
somewhere (on the RadeonFeature web page at
Splitting up the column is a waste of time in my opinion.
Marek
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 8:43 PM, Ilia Mirkin imir...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Benjamin Bellec b.bel...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Correct me if I'm wrong, it looks like EXT_draw_buffers2 (OpenGL 3.0) is
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Benjamin Bellec b.bel...@gmail.com wrote:
As Alex said, this is more like : R600/R700* support GL3.3.
* except original R600 (Radeon HD 2900 series).
I don't know if this can be easily added in your tool or it's even
important to say here. But I think this
Hi,
Correct me if I'm wrong, it looks like EXT_draw_buffers2 (OpenGL 3.0) is
not enabled on Radeon HD2900 (R600 codename) due to hardware limitation.
I have no R600 card to check glxinfo.
David Airlie enabled this extension with this commit:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Benjamin Bellec b.bel...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Correct me if I'm wrong, it looks like EXT_draw_buffers2 (OpenGL 3.0) is
not enabled on Radeon HD2900 (R600 codename) due to hardware limitation.
I have no R600 card to check glxinfo.
David Airlie enabled this
I tried to get some data in the Phoronix forum, without success for the
moment:
http://www.phoronix.com/forums/showthread.php?98234-Can-someone-provides-me-an-glxinfo-output-of-Radeon-HD2900-series-%28R600%29
Maybe we should ask Michael Larabel to write an appeal to witnesses :-)
That said, is
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Benjamin Bellec b.bel...@gmail.com wrote:
I tried to get some data in the Phoronix forum, without success for the
moment:
http://www.phoronix.com/forums/showthread.php?98234-Can-someone-provides-me-an-glxinfo-output-of-Radeon-HD2900-series-%28R600%29
Make sure
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Ilia Mirkin imir...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Benjamin Bellec b.bel...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Correct me if I'm wrong, it looks like EXT_draw_buffers2 (OpenGL 3.0) is
not enabled on Radeon HD2900 (R600 codename) due to hardware
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Roland Scheidegger srol...@vmware.com wrote:
Am 28.03.2014 05:06, schrieb Kenneth Graunke:
I've attached the info for everything on the i965 driver. In case you
ever want to regenerate things, I just ran:
$ INTEL_DEVID_OVERRIDE=0x29a2 glxinfo -l -s gen4
$
Am 28.03.2014 05:06, schrieb Kenneth Graunke:
I've attached the info for everything on the i965 driver. In case you
ever want to regenerate things, I just ran:
$ INTEL_DEVID_OVERRIDE=0x29a2 glxinfo -l -s gen4
$ INTEL_DEVID_OVERRIDE=0x2a42 glxinfo -l -s gen4.5
$
Do people have opinions on whether it'd be useful to also gather data
for older hardware? FWIW I threw my TNT2 in there, which is probably
among the oldest hw supported by mesa.
I'm not sure if it's worthwhile or not, but if you want/need it, I've
got a Radeon x1950 at home that I can pop in
It would be nicer not to use dots to indicate an extension is
supported. I recommend using a high-contrast background color for td
of supported extensions and white or other neutral color for
unsupported extensions, a lot like piglit has green for pass and gray
for skip, but each vendor can have
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Ilia Mirkin imir...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Aaron Watry awa...@gmail.com wrote:
Do people have opinions on whether it'd be useful to also gather data
for older hardware? FWIW I threw my TNT2 in there, which is probably
among the
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Ilia Mirkin imir...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
* core extensions divided into groups based on the GL version
It should be easy to group things however we want. I'm not
sufficiently well-versed in what would be considered useful. If there
are fixed lists of extensions
On 03/27/2014 06:05 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Ilia Mirkin imir...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
* core extensions divided into groups based on the GL version
It should be easy to group things however we want. I'm not
sufficiently well-versed in what would be considered
Hello,
As the outcome of a discussion yesterday on #dri-devel
(http://people.freedesktop.org/~cbrill/dri-log/index.php?channel=dri-develdate=2014-03-25
starting around 16:30), I've created a small page that lists all
extensions/limits supported by core/compat profiles, per driver:
On 03/26/2014 08:24 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
Hello,
As the outcome of a discussion yesterday on #dri-devel
On 26/03/14 14:24, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
Hello,
As the outcome of a discussion yesterday on #dri-devel
(http://people.freedesktop.org/~cbrill/dri-log/index.php?channel=dri-develdate=2014-03-25
starting around 16:30), I've created a small page that lists all
extensions/limits supported by
I'm afraid that relying on glxinfo will only make the lists
incomplete. I'm sure I won't run glxinfo for every Mesa release and
every GPU I have. I guess somebody else will have to maintain
extension lists for radeon if we want to have radeon there.
What I like about GL3.txt that your solution
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Marek Olšák mar...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm afraid that relying on glxinfo will only make the lists
incomplete. I'm sure I won't run glxinfo for every Mesa release and
every GPU I have. I guess somebody else will have to maintain
extension lists for radeon if we
20 matches
Mail list logo
