On 06/21/2013 10:09 PM, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
On 06/21/2013 11:29 AM, Eric Anholt wrote:
Long ago, when porting FBO and memory management support to i965, I
merged a bunch of code between the i915 and i965 drivers and put it in
the intel directory. I think it served us well for a long time,
Long ago, when porting FBO and memory management support to i965, I
merged a bunch of code between the i915 and i965 drivers and put it in
the intel directory. I think it served us well for a long time, as both
drivers got improvements from shared work on that code. But since then,
we've talked
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net wrote:
Long ago, when porting FBO and memory management support to i965, I
merged a bunch of code between the i915 and i965 drivers and put it in
the intel directory. I think it served us well for a long time, as both
drivers got
On 06/21/2013 01:25 PM, Patrick Baggett wrote:
I'm not a developer, but I like to keep up with the drivers that I have
hardware for. Please take my opinions with a grain of salt.
When you say you break i915 more than you improve it, do you mean to say
that it is difficult to improve !i915
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Kenneth Graunke kenn...@whitecape.orgwrote:
On 06/21/2013 01:25 PM, Patrick Baggett wrote:
I'm not a developer, but I like to keep up with the drivers that I have
hardware for. Please take my opinions with a grain of salt.
When you say you break i915 more
The latter is true as well. Unfortunately, community work is hampered by
the fact that Intel hasn't released public documentation for i915 class
hardware. From time to time we've tried to find and motivate the right
people to make that happen, but it hasn't yet. Most people in the
On 06/21/2013 11:29 AM, Eric Anholt wrote:
Long ago, when porting FBO and memory management support to i965, I
merged a bunch of code between the i915 and i965 drivers and put it in
the intel directory. I think it served us well for a long time, as both
drivers got improvements from shared work
