BTW I remember that somebody said shader outputs (and inputs?) are not
indexable in TGSI, but now I added the CAP for it. Should that CAP go away
or are we gonna allow it?
Marek
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Marek Olšák mar...@gmail.com wrote:
Required because ATI and NVIDIA DX9 GPUs do not
We've had indirect addressing of inputs/outputs for a long time (tgsi
supports it and softpipe/llvmpipe support it).
-Brian
On 11/11/2010 10:16 AM, Marek Olšák wrote:
BTW I remember that somebody said shader outputs (and inputs?) are not
indexable in TGSI, but now I added the CAP for it.
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 12:29 -0800, Marek Olšák wrote:
Required because ATI and NVIDIA DX9 GPUs do not support indirect addressing
of temps, inputs, outputs, and consts (FS-only) or the hw support is so
limited that we cannot use it.
This should make r300g and possibly nvfx more feature
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 9:48 PM, José Fonseca jfons...@vmware.com wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 12:29 -0800, Marek Olšák wrote:
Required because ATI and NVIDIA DX9 GPUs do not support indirect
addressing
of temps, inputs, outputs, and consts (FS-only) or the hw support is so
limited that
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 13:24 -0800, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 9:48 PM, José Fonseca
jfons...@vmware.commailto:jfons...@vmware.com wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 12:29 -0800, Marek Olšák wrote:
Required because ATI and NVIDIA DX9 GPUs do not support indirect addressing
of
