On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net wrote:
On Wed, 7 Dec 2011 10:24:09 +, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Dave Airlie airl...@redhat.com
This keeps track of the creation process and stores a drawable type,
it then blocks DRI2 from getting called if the
On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 09:40 +, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net wrote:
On Wed, 7 Dec 2011 10:24:09 +, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Dave Airlie airl...@redhat.com
This keeps track of the creation process and stores a
On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 10:14 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 09:40 +, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net wrote:
On Wed, 7 Dec 2011 10:24:09 +, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Dave Airlie airl...@redhat.com
On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 16:45 +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 10:14 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
The server is the only thing that knows how to handle this scenario, and
it _can_ get this request, so you have to fix it there anyway.
Actually no, the DRI2 code in the server
On Mit, 2011-12-07 at 10:24 +, Dave Airlie wrote:
From: Dave Airlie airl...@redhat.com
This keeps track of the creation process and stores a drawable type,
it then blocks DRI2 from getting called if the drawable is a pixmap.
v2: check if we have a GLX drawable, which means we aren't a
On Wed, 7 Dec 2011 10:24:09 +, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Dave Airlie airl...@redhat.com
This keeps track of the creation process and stores a drawable type,
it then blocks DRI2 from getting called if the drawable is a pixmap.
v2: check if we have a GLX drawable, which
