On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> I really liked this idea, as it should help with management of packet
> parsing tools like the CL dump. The python script is forked off of theirs
> because our packets are byte-based instead of dwords, and the changes to
> do
Kenneth Graunke writes:
> [ Unknown signature status ]
> On Wednesday, June 28, 2017 11:18:40 AM PDT Eric Anholt wrote:
>> I really liked this idea, as it should help with management of packet
>> parsing tools like the CL dump. The python script is forked off of theirs
>>
On Wednesday, June 28, 2017 11:18:40 AM PDT Eric Anholt wrote:
> I really liked this idea, as it should help with management of packet
> parsing tools like the CL dump. The python script is forked off of theirs
> because our packets are byte-based instead of dwords, and the changes to
> do so
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> I really liked this idea, as it should help with management of packet
> parsing tools like the CL dump. The python script is forked off of theirs
> because our packets are byte-based instead of dwords, and the changes to
>
Hi Eric,
On 28 June 2017 at 19:18, Eric Anholt wrote:
> I really liked this idea, as it should help with management of packet
> parsing tools like the CL dump. The python script is forked off of theirs
> because our packets are byte-based instead of dwords, and the changes to
>