For simple MR without rb/ab is good, but for large MR, part of them are
reviewed, and part of are not.
I would suggest for large MR, the reviewed commits's title can styled with
for example:
```
xlib(ab): Some change acked of xlib
```
```
xlib(rb): Some change reviewed of xlib
```
For changes
t; > > -Original Message-
> > > From: mesa-dev On Behalf Of
> Gert Wollny
> > > Sent: Friday, October 7, 2022 2:37 AM
> > > To: erik.faye-lund ; Alyssa Rosenzweig <
> aly...@collabora.com>; Mike Blumenkrantz
> > > Cc: ML mesa-dev
>
; Alyssa Rosenzweig
> > ; Mike Blumenkrantz
> > Cc: ML mesa-dev
> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Zink MR signoff tags
> >
> > On Wed, 2022-10-05 at 17:21 +0200, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2022-10-05 at 08:20 -0400, Alyssa Rosenzweig wrote:
> > > &g
Of Gert
> Wollny
> Sent: Friday, October 7, 2022 2:37 AM
> To: erik.faye-lund ; Alyssa Rosenzweig
> ; Mike Blumenkrantz
> Cc: ML mesa-dev
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Zink MR signoff tags
>
> On Wed, 2022-10-05 at 17:21 +0200, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
> > On W
Cc: ML mesa-dev
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Zink MR signoff tags
On Wed, 2022-10-05 at 17:21 +0200, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-10-05 at 08:20 -0400, Alyssa Rosenzweig wrote:
> > + for not requiring rb/ab tags ...
>
> I think it's time to think about making this chang
On Wed, 2022-10-05 at 17:21 +0200, Erik Faye-Lund wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-10-05 at 08:20 -0400, Alyssa Rosenzweig wrote:
> > + for not requiring rb/ab tags ...
>
> I think it's time to think about making this change all over Mesa as
> well. We're deeply in bed with GitLab by now, so I don't think
>
That's a good idea.
Marek
On Wed, Oct 5, 2022, 11:22 Erik Faye-Lund
wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-10-05 at 08:20 -0400, Alyssa Rosenzweig wrote:
> > + for not requiring rb/ab tags ...
>
> I think it's time to think about making this change all over Mesa as
> well. We're deeply in bed with GitLab by
> > + for not requiring rb/ab tags ...
>
> I think it's time to think about making this change all over Mesa as
> well. We're deeply in bed with GitLab by now, so I don't think there's
> a realistic chance that this isn't going to just be duplicate info any
> time soon...
I agree, but I don't
On Wed, 2022-10-05 at 08:20 -0400, Alyssa Rosenzweig wrote:
> + for not requiring rb/ab tags ...
I think it's time to think about making this change all over Mesa as
well. We're deeply in bed with GitLab by now, so I don't think there's
a realistic chance that this isn't going to just be
+ for not requiring rb/ab tags ... I kinda like the s-o-b tags but those
don't require fiddly rebases, just -s in the right place..
On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 10:44:31PM -0500, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
>Hi,
>After some vigorous and robust discussion with Erik, we've decided that
>zink
Hi,
After some vigorous and robust discussion with Erik, we've decided that
zink will no longer require any rb/ab/etb tags to be applied to patches in
MRs.
Following in Turnip's footsteps, any MR that receives sufficient reviewage
in gitlab comments can be merged directly with no further action
11 matches
Mail list logo
