Does the attached patch fix the issue? (and is the fix correct?)
Marek
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 7:30 PM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
http://tinderbox.x.org/builds/2010-09-24-0001/logs/libGL/#build
looks
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Jerome Glisse j.gli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Bas Nieuwenhuizen
b...@basnieuwenhuizen.nl wrote:
These patches fix piglit test occlusion-query-discard in the new design of
r600g.
The evergreen code is only compile tested as I don't
randrianas...@gmail.com wrote:
Can freedesktop/X.org organise something like Google summer (winter?) of
Code,
with some tasks, need for moving those drivers forward? Good documentation
about _today_ mesa's internals and interfaces hopefully will speed up
process?
X.Org has a Endless
Signed-off-by: Tilman Sauerbeck til...@code-monkey.de
---
src/gallium/drivers/r600/r600_blit.c |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/r600/r600_blit.c
b/src/gallium/drivers/r600/r600_blit.c
index c30a7c1..7f411ae 100644
---
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Xavier Chantry
chantry.xav...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 11:36 PM, Xavier Chantry
chantry.xav...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Luca Barbieri l...@luca-barbieri.com
wrote:
Yes, that used to happen for me too.
Just edit
Uhh.. also, were we not using the intrinsics on x86 before?
Attached checks intrinsics before x86 and the new x86_64 block, so
that the latter are fallbacks if intrinsics aren't available.
-tom
tom fogal tfo...@sci.utah.edu writes:
A friend of mine had trouble building 7.8.2 on an old gcc3.3
