Fix the cases where it is almost already valid kernel doc, for the
others just nerf the warnings for now.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen
Cc: Jordan Justen
Cc: Daniel Vetter
Cc: Kenneth Graunke
Cc: Jason Ekstrand
Cc: Dave Airlie
Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc:
Hi,
This is our initial proposal for explicit fences everywhere and new memory
management that doesn't use BO fences. It's a redesign of how Linux
graphics drivers work, and it can coexist with what we have now.
*1. Introduction*
(skip this if you are already sold on explicit fences)
The
Add section for drm/i915 uAPI and pull in i915_drm.h.
Suggested-by: Daniel Vetter
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen
Cc: Jordan Justen
Cc: Daniel Vetter
Cc: Kenneth Graunke
Cc: Jason Ekstrand
Cc: Dave Airlie
Cc: dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc:
Add some example usage for the extension chaining also, which is quite
nifty.
v2: (Daniel)
- clarify that the name is just some integer, also document that the
name space is not global
v3: prefer kernel-doc references for structs
Suggested-by: Daniel Vetter
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld
Add a note about the two-step process.
v2(Tvrtko):
- Also document the other method of just passing in a buffer which is
large enough, which avoids two ioctl calls. Can make sense for
smaller query items.
v3: prefer kernel-doc references for structs and members
Suggested-by: Daniel
On 16/04/2021 17:38, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 11:04 AM Matthew Auld wrote:
Add an entry for the new uAPI needed for DG1.
v2(Daniel):
- include the overall upstreaming plan
- add a note for mmap, there are differences here for TTM vs i915
- bunch of other
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 7:02 AM Matthew Auld wrote:
>
> On 16/04/2021 17:38, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 11:04 AM Matthew Auld
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Add an entry for the new uAPI needed for DG1.
> >>
> >> v2(Daniel):
> >>- include the overall upstreaming plan
> >>-
Not going to comment on everything on the first pass...
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 5:48 AM Marek Olšák wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This is our initial proposal for explicit fences everywhere and new memory
> management that doesn't use BO fences. It's a redesign of how Linux graphics
> drivers work, and
Add an entry for the new uAPI needed for DG1. Also add the overall
upstream plan, including some notes for the TTM conversion.
v2(Daniel):
- include the overall upstreaming plan
- add a note for mmap, there are differences here for TTM vs i915
- bunch of other suggestions from Daniel
v3:
We already don't have accurate BO fences in some cases. Instead, BOs can
have fences which are equal to the last seen command buffer for each queue.
It's practically the same as if the kernel had no visibility into command
submissions and just added a fence into all queues when it needed to wait
10 matches
Mail list logo
