https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58326
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Boll andreas.boll@gmail.com ---
works fine for me
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
mesa-dev mailing list
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60098
Priority: medium
Bug ID: 60098
Keywords: regression
CC: e0425...@student.tuwien.ac.at
Assignee: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Summary: [softpipe] Unexpected PIPE_CAP 78 query
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59851
Quentin Glidic sardemff7+freedesk...@sardemff7.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #73648|0 |1
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59851
--- Comment #3 from Tom Stellard tstel...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Created attachment 73992 [details] [review]
Patch to fix mesa configure
Patch fixed and with a different logic. Now force-enable LLVM shared
libraries in a
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60121
Priority: medium
Bug ID: 60121
Assignee: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Summary: build - libvdpau_softpipe fails at runtime.
Severity: normal
Classification: Unclassified
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59967
--- Comment #9 from Johannes Obermayr johannesoberm...@gmx.de ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Johannes, I totally fail to see how your rant explains this problem at all.
Michel, thanks to making me thinking on this issue a second time.
First I
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60121
--- Comment #1 from Matt Turner matts...@gmail.com ---
Try running under strace to see what's going wrong.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
mesa-dev
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59967
Mike Lothian m...@fireburn.co.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@fireburn.co.uk
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60121
--- Comment #2 from Andy Furniss li...@andyfurniss.entadsl.com ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Try running under strace to see what's going wrong.
Below is what happens - I don't know why - it opens /usr/lib/vdpau OK but then
there are a bunch of
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59494
lu hua huax...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60143
Daniel van Vugt daniel.van.v...@canonical.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60143
--- Comment #1 from Daniel van Vugt daniel.van.v...@canonical.com ---
Or even simpler fix...
bo-base.base.format = format;
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59364
Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29130
Andreas Boll andreas.boll@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29033
Andreas Boll andreas.boll@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29033
Andreas Boll andreas.boll@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60044
Brian Paul bri...@vmware.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59967
--- Comment #11 from Fabio Pedretti fabio@libero.it ---
Note that I am getting the same error when changing configure.ac to use
llvm-config-3.2, when configuring with --with-llvm-prefix=/usr/lib/llvm-3.2 or
when using
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59737
--- Comment #7 from Alexandre Demers alexandre.f.dem...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #6)
(In reply to comment #5)
Patch sent.
... Anyone able to test the patch?
Yes I can. What should be tested exactly?
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59737
--- Comment #8 from Matt Turner matts...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #7)
(In reply to comment #6)
(In reply to comment #5)
Patch sent.
... Anyone able to test the patch?
Yes I can. What should be tested exactly?
Testing that
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59737
--- Comment #9 from Alexandre Demers alexandre.f.dem...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #8)
(In reply to comment #7)
(In reply to comment #6)
(In reply to comment #5)
Patch sent.
... Anyone able to test the patch?
Yes I
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59737
--- Comment #10 from Matt Turner matts...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #9)
(In reply to comment #8)
(In reply to comment #7)
(In reply to comment #6)
(In reply to comment #5)
Patch sent.
... Anyone able to test the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59737
--- Comment #11 from Alexandre Demers alexandre.f.dem...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #10)
(In reply to comment #9)
(In reply to comment #8)
(In reply to comment #7)
(In reply to comment #6)
(In reply to comment #5)
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60197
Priority: medium
Bug ID: 60197
Assignee: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Summary: Mesa Gallium VPATH build is broken
Severity: normal
Classification: Unclassified
OS: All
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60197
--- Comment #1 from Quentin Glidic sardemff7+freedesk...@sardemff7.net ---
Created attachment 74098
-- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=74098action=edit
First patch to fix gallium/auxiliary
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60197
--- Comment #2 from Quentin Glidic sardemff7+freedesk...@sardemff7.net ---
Created attachment 74099
-- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=74099action=edit
Second patch for gallium/egl with Wayland
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59187
Fabian Henze flyse...@gmx.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||flyse...@gmx.de
--
You
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59737
Matt Turner matts...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60216
--- Comment #1 from Matt Turner matts...@gmail.com ---
Where is HAVE_WINSYS_XLIB defined? I don't think it ever is, which makes the
existing check to use it wrong.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60197
--- Comment #3 from Matt Turner matts...@gmail.com ---
The wayland patch is totally believable. I can reproduce that and I'll commit
it.
What flags do you have to build with to reproduce the problem the first problem
fixes?
--
You are
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59967
--- Comment #12 from Fabio Pedretti fabio@libero.it ---
I suggest to remove this configure check since it prevents building on an
otherwise working setup. Better risking of failing during make rather than
during configure if the make would
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59876
--- Comment #1 from Stefan Brüns stefan.bru...@rwth-aachen.de ---
Created attachment 74192
-- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=74192action=edit
proposed patch
The libxcb XXX_data_length(reply) function does *not* return the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44743
--- Comment #8 from Vasily Khoruzhick anars...@gmail.com ---
Still happens with llvmpipe, but system has changed,
now it's Core i5-3320M and 64-bit OS (still Archlinux), earlier it was
Core 2 Duo T5500 with 32-bit OS
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44743
--- Comment #9 from Vasily Khoruzhick anars...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 74194
-- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=74194action=edit
cpuinfo
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59876
Matt Turner matts...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i...@freedesktop.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60294
Priority: medium
Bug ID: 60294
Assignee: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Summary: Flashplayer cracshing
Severity: normal
Classification: Unclassified
OS: Linux (All)
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60294
René Blokland pe1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unspecified |git
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60294
René Blokland pe1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Flashplayer cracshing |Flashplayer crashing
--
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60294
--- Comment #2 from Alex Deucher ag...@yahoo.com ---
Please attach your xorg log and dmesg output. Is this a self built mesa? A
disto package?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60294
--- Comment #3 from René Blokland pe1...@gmail.com ---
It is self built
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
mesa-dev mailing list
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60294
--- Comment #4 from René Blokland pe1...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 74198
-- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=74198action=edit
Xorg.log
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60294
--- Comment #5 from René Blokland pe1...@gmail.com ---
bugzilla donẗ let me add dmesg (submit does nothing)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
mesa-dev
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60294
--- Comment #6 from René Blokland pe1...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 74206
-- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=74206action=edit
dmesg
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60294
--- Comment #7 from René Blokland pe1...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #5)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
mesa-dev mailing list
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60298
Priority: medium
Bug ID: 60298
Keywords: regression
CC: i...@freedesktop.org
Assignee: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Summary: piglit arb_uniform_buffer_object-row-major
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60294
--- Comment #8 from Armin K kre...@email.com ---
It's not that I am a dev or something, but you should first consider upgrading
the kernel. Releases from 3.8-rc2 to 3.8-rc6 include lot of fixes and maybe it
could solve your problems.
--
You are
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44743
--- Comment #10 from José Fonseca jfons...@vmware.com ---
(In reply to comment #9)
Created attachment 74194 [details]
cpuinfo
Thanks. Your processor has SSE4.1, which is what we test the most, so it can't
be for lack of processor features.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44743
--- Comment #11 from Vasily Khoruzhick anars...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #10)
(In reply to comment #9)
Created attachment 74194 [details]
cpuinfo
Thanks. Your processor has SSE4.1, which is what we test the most, so it
can't be
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60294
Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44743
--- Comment #13 from José Fonseca jfons...@vmware.com ---
I tried the trace here w/ NVIDIA GL driver and the rendering here looks just
like your screenshot.
I though by artefacts you meant the countours in the balls, but I'm not sure
anymore.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60197
--- Comment #4 from Quentin Glidic sardemff7+freedesk...@sardemff7.net ---
(In reply to comment #3)
The wayland patch is totally believable. I can reproduce that and I'll
commit it.
Thanks
What flags do you have to build with to reproduce
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44743
--- Comment #14 from Vasily Khoruzhick anars...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #13)
I tried the trace here w/ NVIDIA GL driver and the rendering here looks just
like your screenshot.
I though by artefacts you meant the countours in the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60326
Priority: medium
Bug ID: 60326
Assignee: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Summary: new account request
Severity: normal
Classification: Unclassified
OS: All
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60216
--- Comment #2 from Quentin Glidic sardemff7+freedesk...@sardemff7.net ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Where is HAVE_WINSYS_XLIB defined? I don't think it ever is, which makes the
existing check to use it wrong.
Oh, right, it’s only used in
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60326
Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.v...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59876
--- Comment #3 from Stefan Brüns stefan.bru...@rwth-aachen.de ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Nice. Please send a git-formatted patch to mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
and CC Ian Romanick i...@freedesktop.org.
Done.
BTW: The repository paths on
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59876
Stefan Brüns stefan.bru...@rwth-aachen.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59967
Johannes Obermayr johannesoberm...@gmx.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59967
--- Comment #14 from Tom Stellard tstel...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #12)
I suggest to remove this configure check since it prevents building on an
otherwise working setup. Better risking of failing during make rather than
during
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59876
--- Comment #4 from Brian Paul bri...@vmware.com ---
(In reply to comment #3)
BTW: The repository paths on http://www.mesa3d.org/repository.html are
slightly wrong, its missing a trailing .git, i.e.
git clone
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59304
Bug 59304 depends on bug 59332, which changed state.
Bug 59332 Summary: Problems building 32bit Mesa
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59332
What|Removed |Added
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59304
Matt Turner matts...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|59332 |
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60143
--- Comment #2 from Daniel van Vugt daniel.van.v...@canonical.com ---
Created attachment 74279
-- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=74279action=edit
gbm_dri_bo_create: Remember to initialize format
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60086
Kristian Høgsberg k...@bitplanet.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop. |k...@bitplanet.net
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60143
--- Comment #3 from Kristian Høgsberg k...@bitplanet.net ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Created attachment 74279 [details] [review]
gbm_dri_bo_create: Remember to initialize format
That looks good, but please also fix create_dumb() and attach
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49779
Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|medium |low
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60395
--- Comment #1 from commanderan...@yahoo.com ---
Created attachment 74318
-- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=74318action=edit
GPG Key
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60395
Priority: medium
Bug ID: 60395
Assignee: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Summary: Developer account request
Severity: normal
Classification: Unclassified
OS: All
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60395
--- Comment #2 from Matt Turner matts...@gmail.com ---
Have you contributed to Mesa before? Usually we want a history of
contributions.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60395
--- Comment #3 from Brian Paul bri...@vmware.com ---
I see no history of any Mesa patches from you. You should begin by posting
patches for review on the mesa-dev list.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59238
--- Comment #6 from Maarten Lankhorst m.b.lankho...@gmail.com ---
http://paste.ubuntu.com/1620151/plain/ is the patch I used to reduce visibility
in debian-experimental, I could commit this if there is interest
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60395
--- Comment #4 from commanderan...@yahoo.com ---
Oh ok. I can get started with the standard patch review process on the mailing
list. Works for me. Thanks gents!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59238
--- Comment #7 from Matt Turner matts...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #6)
http://paste.ubuntu.com/1620151/plain/ is the patch I used to reduce
visibility in debian-experimental, I could commit this if there is interest
Maybe pastebin
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59238
--- Comment #8 from Maarten Lankhorst m.b.lankho...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 74370
-- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=74370action=edit
visibility patch for xatracker1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59187
seves985 seves...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seves...@gmail.com
--
You
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60518
Priority: medium
Bug ID: 60518
Assignee: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Summary: glDrawElements segfault when compiled into display
list
Severity: normal
Classification:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60518
--- Comment #1 from cor...@gmx.net ---
Apitrace download link (attaching failed due to size):
http://www.gamefront.com/files/22931297/vdrift.trace.gz
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60524
Priority: medium
Bug ID: 60524
Keywords: regression
CC: mar...@gmail.com
Assignee: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Summary: [softpipe] piglit depthstencil-render-miplevels 146
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60527
Priority: medium
Bug ID: 60527
Keywords: regression
CC: mar...@gmail.com
Assignee: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Summary: [softpipe] fbo-stencil GL_DEPTH24_STENCIL8 clear
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44239
Pavel Ondračka pavel.ondra...@email.cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58872
Vinson Lee v...@freedesktop.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60686
Priority: medium
Bug ID: 60686
Assignee: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Summary: New account request
Severity: normal
Classification: Unclassified
OS: All
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60686
--- Comment #1 from Adhemerval Zanella Netto azane...@linux.vnet.ibm.com ---
Created attachment 74649
-- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=74649action=edit
SSH RSA
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60686
--- Comment #2 from Ian Romanick i...@freedesktop.org ---
The usual way to get commit access to open source projects is to submit patches
to the mailing list first. Once you have a track record you can apply for
commit access.
--
You are
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60686
--- Comment #3 from Roland Scheidegger srol...@vmware.com ---
(In reply to comment #2)
The usual way to get commit access to open source projects is to submit
patches to the mailing list first. Once you have a track record you can
apply for
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60706
Priority: medium
Bug ID: 60706
Keywords: regression
CC: srol...@vmware.com
Assignee: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Summary: [llvmpipe] piglit fbo-blending-formats
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60706
--- Comment #2 from Roland Scheidegger srol...@vmware.com ---
This actually still passes here and on a quick look the math looks right to me
too. Is this llvm-3.3 specific?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60706
Vinson Lee v...@freedesktop.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60723
Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|dri-devel@lists.freedesktop
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60047
Brian Paul bri...@vmware.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60524
Brian Paul bri...@vmware.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60527
Brian Paul bri...@vmware.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60706
--- Comment #4 from José Fonseca jfons...@vmware.com ---
(In reply to comment #3)
This regression is llvm-3.3 specific. The test passes with llvm-3.2 and
llvm-3.1.
I've reported the regression to LLVM Bugzilla.
Thanks Vinson!
--
You are
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60737
Priority: medium
Bug ID: 60737
Assignee: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Summary: In GLSL ES, a missing FS precision qualifier does not
generate an error
Severity: normal
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60686
ajax at nwnk dot net a...@nwnk.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60737
--- Comment #1 from Paul Berry stereotype...@gmail.com ---
Ok, this turned out to be more complex than I thought (don't they always?). In
addition to the problem described above:
1. The spec says that default precision statements are alowed on
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59187
--- Comment #2 from Ian Romanick i...@freedesktop.org ---
*** Bug 60481 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60737
Paul Berry stereotype...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|medium |low
--- Comment #2
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59187
Benjamin Berg benja...@sipsolutions.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57121
Markus Wick wickmar...@web.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop. |i...@freedesktop.org
701 - 800 of 22592 matches
Mail list logo
