On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 06/10/2016 05:20 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>
>> It's pretty easy for me to fix up before I apply it too, but if I "git
>> am" your email, it'll be attributed to the one you sent it from,
>> unless that From line is
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Jan Vesely wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-06-10 at 11:20 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 6:28 AM, Stephan Bergmann > m> wrote:
>> > On 06/10/2016 12:09 PM, Eric Engestrom wrote:
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Jun
On 06/10/2016 05:20 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
It's pretty easy for me to fix up before I apply it too, but if I "git
am" your email, it'll be attributed to the one you sent it from,
unless that From line is there as line 1 of the email body. Just let
me know if you want me to fix it up. Despite the
On Fri, 2016-06-10 at 11:20 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 6:28 AM, Stephan Bergmann m> wrote:
> > On 06/10/2016 12:09 PM, Eric Engestrom wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 05:13:20PM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> > >
> > > Since you didn't
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 6:28 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 06/10/2016 12:09 PM, Eric Engestrom wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 05:13:20PM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
>>
>> Since you didn't send this patch from your primary email account,
>> you might want to add
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 12:28:38PM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 06/10/2016 12:09 PM, Eric Engestrom wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 05:13:20PM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> >
> > Since you didn't send this patch from your primary email account,
> > you might want to add this line
On 06/10/2016 12:09 PM, Eric Engestrom wrote:
On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 05:13:20PM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Since you didn't send this patch from your primary email account,
you might want to add this line here, otherwise the author will be
"stephan.bergmann.second...@googlemail.com":
On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 05:13:20PM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Since you didn't send this patch from your primary email account,
you might want to add this line here, otherwise the author will be
"stephan.bergmann.second...@googlemail.com":
From: Stephan Bergmann
>
...when Function::domTree is created as DominatorTree in Function::convertToSSA
(src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_ssa.cpp) but destroyed only as base
Graph in ~Function (src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_bb.cpp).
---
src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_graph.h | 2 +-
On 06/09/2016 05:01 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
Is this all because Graph doesn't have a virtual destructor? We don't
construct/destruct those too often, I'd much rather just make it
virtual rather than moving DominatorTree.
Yes, that of course also works. Corresponding patch coming.
Is this all because Graph doesn't have a virtual destructor? We don't
construct/destruct those too often, I'd much rather just make it
virtual rather than moving DominatorTree.
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Stephan Bergmann
wrote:
> ...when
...when Function::domTree is created as DominatorTree in Function::convertToSSA
(src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_ssa.cpp) but destroyed only as base
Graph in ~Function (src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_bb.cpp).
---
src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir.h | 37
Please send the patch inline, and in such a way that I'll be able to apply
it with git am. Git send-email does the right thing, FYI.
On Jun 9, 2016 9:26 AM, "Stephan Bergmann" wrote:
> see attached 0001-Avoid-ASan-new-delete-type-mismatch.patch
>
>
see attached 0001-Avoid-ASan-new-delete-type-mismatch.patch
>From 653d9da624c56fab05ed568133f30640b9e75b4f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stephan Bergmann
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 15:21:46 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Avoid ASan new-delete-type-mismatch
...when Function::domTree is
14 matches
Mail list logo