On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Andres Gomez wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> this patch has been collected for 17.2.0-rc3 but, for 17.1.x, the
> conflicts are not so trivial and the landed commit was tagged for
> stable without specifying the actual branch.
>
> Therefore, unless you
Hi Dave,
this patch has been collected for 17.2.0-rc3 but, for 17.1.x, the
conflicts are not so trivial and the landed commit was tagged for
stable without specifying the actual branch.
Therefore, unless you intended this also for 17.1.x and would like to
provide a backport, I'm more keen on
Tested on SI.
Acked-by: Marek Olšák
Marek
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 6:14 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> From: Dave Airlie
>
> This looks like it's supported since llvm 3.9 at least,
> so switch over radeonsi and radv to using it, -pro also
>
On 1 August 2017 at 14:14, Dave Airlie wrote:
> From: Dave Airlie
>
> This looks like it's supported since llvm 3.9 at least,
> so switch over radeonsi and radv to using it, -pro also
> uses this. We can now drop creating lds for these operations
> as the
From: Dave Airlie
This looks like it's supported since llvm 3.9 at least,
so switch over radeonsi and radv to using it, -pro also
uses this. We can now drop creating lds for these operations
as the ds_swizzle operation doesn't actually write to lds at all.
Signed-off-by: