On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 07:11:35PM -0400, Jan Vesely wrote:
Make the function static.
No need to cc llvm-commits on these mesa patches. Reviewers follow both
lists.
This needs corresponding change in LLVM otherwise it breaks parameter passing
CC: Tom Stellard t...@stellard.net
CC: Matt
On Thu, 2014-07-31 at 11:02 -0400, Tom Stellard wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 07:11:35PM -0400, Jan Vesely wrote:
Make the function static.
No need to cc llvm-commits on these mesa patches. Reviewers follow both
lists.
sorry about that
This needs corresponding change in LLVM
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 01:28:45PM -0400, Jan Vesely wrote:
On Thu, 2014-07-31 at 11:02 -0400, Tom Stellard wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 07:11:35PM -0400, Jan Vesely wrote:
Make the function static.
No need to cc llvm-commits on these mesa patches. Reviewers follow both
lists.
On Thu, 2014-07-31 at 14:58 -0400, Tom Stellard wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 01:28:45PM -0400, Jan Vesely wrote:
On Thu, 2014-07-31 at 11:02 -0400, Tom Stellard wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 07:11:35PM -0400, Jan Vesely wrote:
Make the function static.
No need to cc
On 07/31/2014 03:58 PM, Jan Vesely wrote:
Would that work with things like one kernel calling another kernel? If
we had a function called from two kernels how would it know where to
look?
I don't think this case can be handled as 2 separate kernels with the
same calling convention. If a kernel
Make the function static.
This needs corresponding change in LLVM otherwise it breaks parameter passing
CC: Tom Stellard t...@stellard.net
CC: Matt Arsenault matthew.arsena...@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Jan Vesely jan.ves...@rutgers.edu
---
src/gallium/drivers/r600/evergreen_compute.c | 26
