[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/3] i965: Don't depth test the fake depthbuffer when one isn't present.

For the non-separate-stencil-only case, we've been using a NULL surface for depth, so we didn't have to care. However, to support separate stencil with no depthbuffer, we have to make the depth surface non-NULL or the stencil test always fails thanks to separate stencil inheriting the surface

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/3] i965: Don't depth test the fake depthbuffer when one isn't present.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/28/2011 10:48 AM, Eric Anholt wrote: For the non-separate-stencil-only case, we've been using a NULL surface for depth, so we didn't have to care. However, to support separate stencil with no depthbuffer, we have to make the depth surface