Re: [Mesa-dev] Re: [mesa] Link information in Mesa 3.3?

2000-02-15 Thread Brian Paul
Thomas Tanner wrote: On 13-Feb-00 Brian Paul wrote: Is there any reason Mesa 3.3 is building without link information in the library? Those of us who dlopen() the library get a dl_error because we can't anticipate the need of, say, Glide. I guess you're using the GNU configure scripts,

[Mesa-dev] check-in: Linux library dependency changes

2000-02-15 Thread Brian Paul
As I wrote earlier, I changed the old-style Makefile so that the libGL, libGLU, and libglut libraries are implicitly linked with the libraries that each is dependent on. This is done with the GL_LIB_DEPS, GLU_LIB_DEPS, GLUT_LIB_DEPS and APP_LIB_DEPS vars in the Make-config file. These are used

[Mesa-dev] Question about ProjectionMatrix

2000-02-15 Thread Michael Vance
This is all with respect to software Mesa: Where can I find information about the values in ctx-ProjectionMatrix? I'm tracing through the glFog code, and for the code I'm testing the value of eyez is always zero, so for EXP and EXP2 modes, the e^tmp value is always 1.0, and therefore no fogging

Re: [Mesa-dev] Mesa 3.2 FX driver RGB lookup tables

2000-02-15 Thread Neal Tringham
Brian Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes The span-writing functions use the LFB_WRITE_SPAN_MESA macro which is conditionally defined for RGB vs BGR order. AFAIK, the RGB vs BGR problem was only on pixel read-back, not writing. If we indeed have to write different pixel formats depending on a runtime

Re: [Mesa-dev] Mesa 3.2 FX driver RGB lookup tables

2000-02-15 Thread Kenneth C. Dyke
Neal Tringham wrote: > Brian Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > >The span-writing functions use the LFB_WRITE_SPAN_MESA macro which > >is conditionally defined for RGB vs BGR order. > > > >AFAIK, the RGB vs BGR problem was only on pixel read-back, not > >writing. If we indeed have to write