On 18/08/17 11:00, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
On Thursday, August 17, 2017 4:41:52 PM PDT Timothy Arceri wrote:
On 18/08/17 08:30, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
On Tuesday, August 15, 2017 3:42:29 AM PDT Timothy Arceri wrote:
Gallium drivers use this code path so we need to account for
bindless after
On Thursday, August 17, 2017 4:41:52 PM PDT Timothy Arceri wrote:
> On 18/08/17 08:30, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 15, 2017 3:42:29 AM PDT Timothy Arceri wrote:
> >> Gallium drivers use this code path so we need to account for
> >> bindless after all.
> >
> > Why do Gallium
On 18/08/17 08:30, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
On Tuesday, August 15, 2017 3:42:29 AM PDT Timothy Arceri wrote:
Gallium drivers use this code path so we need to account for
bindless after all.
Why do Gallium drivers use ir_to_mesa? That seems like a misfeature.
Because Gallium drivers still use
On Tuesday, August 15, 2017 3:42:29 AM PDT Timothy Arceri wrote:
> Gallium drivers use this code path so we need to account for
> bindless after all.
Why do Gallium drivers use ir_to_mesa? That seems like a misfeature.
i965 stopped using it years ago.
--Ken
signature.asc
Description: This is
On 15/08/17 23:07, Marek Olšák wrote:
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák
Marek
Pushed, Thanks.
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák
Marek
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Timothy Arceri wrote:
> Gallium drivers use this code path so we need to account for
> bindless after all.
>
> Fixes: 365d34540f33 ("mesa: correctly calculate the storage offset for