Re: MC IDE - next steps

2003-08-28 Thread xbury . cs
I vote for Richard as President next year! oops, Im not a US citizen... I will gladly maintain the script editor and documentation but one thing I came across this morning lifted a serious problem: engine info... When the MC engine is changed (like 2.4-2.5), there are changes left and right

Re: MC IDE - Next steps

2003-08-28 Thread FlexibleLearning
I vote for Richard as President next year! oops, Im not a US citizen. Belatedly I would also wish to express my support for the MC 'fast-track' contuance. Two points... [1] I am not a U.S citizen either, but Richard gets whatever is worth of my UK vote, depending also whether he actually wants

Re: MC IDE - Next steps

2003-08-28 Thread xbury . cs
] cc:^ Subject:Re: MC IDE - Next steps I vote for Richard as President next year! oops, Im not a US citizen. Belatedly I would also wish to express my support for the MC 'fast-track' contuance. Two points... [1] I am not a U.S citizen either, but Richard gets whatever is worth

Re: MC IDE - Next steps

2003-08-28 Thread FlexibleLearning
In a message dated 28/08/2003 05:59:43 PM GMT Daylight Time, Xavier writes: You could keep my Script Editor X 2.4 up to date! Im considering deprecating it... ;) Yeah! A job at last! /H

MC IDE - next steps

2003-08-27 Thread Tariel Gogoberidze
on 8/26/03 9:13 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Every project needs an owner. Not in the legal sense of property, but in the terms of responsibility. - Who wants to be the team leader on this? And should the project lead be a rotating position, maybe annually or

Re: MC IDE - next steps

2003-08-26 Thread Scott Rossi
Recently, Richard Gaskin wrote: At a minimum it makes sense to have some means of easily moving a substack from someone's contributed progress build into the master. We could go hog wild and build a complete check-in/check-out system, but frankly I think that may be far more effort than

Re: MC IDE - next steps

2003-08-26 Thread xbury . cs
Hi everyone, In response to Richard's message... I thought it might be nice to separate the stacks/substacks into a folder. The reasons being that while this may be nice for release it is tortuous for updates and editing. It would also be easier to track Also, I dont mind hosting these files

Re: MC IDE - next steps

2003-08-26 Thread David Bovill
Richard Gaskin wrote: Every project needs an owner. Not in the legal sense of property, but in the terms of responsibility. Yes. maybe it is better to let leadership emerge based on work done and contributions to the group. Neutrality and the ability to bring people together around the project

Re: MC IDE - next steps

2003-08-26 Thread David Bovill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - It would be essential also to track versions. David Bovill was hinting at CVS and it's a possibility but I had an idea were we could track these as customproperties instead. Im sure there's advantages to both as well as disadvantages. The essential would be to track

Re: MC IDE - next steps

2003-08-26 Thread xbury . cs
by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 26/08/03 16:21 Please respond to metacard To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:^ Subject:Re: MC IDE - next steps [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - It would be essential also to track versions. David Bovill was hinting at CVS and it's a possibility but I had

MC IDE - next steps

2003-08-26 Thread Alejandro Tejada
Richard Gaskin wrote: I would be happy to volunteer to manage the plugin architecture, with feedback and approval on any specifics from the others here of course. I cast my vote for the plug-in architecture, but I think that those plug-ins are MetaTalk code too, so their discussion could be in