Of all the matrix routines to be built-in, among the most useful would be
the computation of eigenvectors and eigenvalues. Better yet, of course,
would be generalised, singular value decomposition (SVD). With SVD and a
good matrix inversion routine built-in, the remaining routines (and full,
on 11/17/00 1:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott Raney [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
I second the motion: we are already planning to add some features in
this area for the next release and a list of the most useful matrix
operations to have built in would be very handy for
on 11/29/00 8:59 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just noticed I got infected by merryxmas and even know where from. Someone
in the
know or someone who knows someone in the know with these script viruses
should
definitely write a Vaccine for Metacard.
The guy who sent
on 1/31/01 12:48 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/27/01, 9:15:22 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote regarding Re: statistics:
Does anyone have any Metatalk statistical functions to determine
1.correlation coefficients(Pearson and/or Spearman),
2.multiple and logistic regression?
mike
on 2/2/01 1:15 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regarding John's comments on multiple regression:
1. Matrix algebra is not necessary, and for purposes such as stepwise multiple
linear regression will actually get in the way.
-In your opinion, what type of statistics are better suited for
on 4/24/01 9:53 AM, Wilhelm Sanke at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I am suggesting, however, is to have a static or author mode as
a *normal standard feature* of Metacard that is available to anyone -
even to a beginner that tries to find out how Metacard works by looking
at the scripts of
on 6/28/01 8:23 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
member(commentTag).text=member(myParent.myComments).text.line[theLine]
Do we love the dot notation, or do we not? ;-)
Regards,
Scott
'We' do not. At least, not me. I find it ugly and hard to read.
--
6. Stanislaus
Ok, I give up. What's the secret? This should be obvious and simple, but I
can't get any of the alternatives to work. I have a simple field that
collects responses when given the focus, and I want to prevent the user from
typing a return into the field. However, none of keyDown, rawKeyDown,
, Ph.D.
Professor
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience
University of Lethbridge
--
From: John Vokey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 15:04:11 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: capturing the return key in a field
Ok, I give up. What's the secret? This should be obvious
I have a stack that presents a series of disk-based images by replacing
the file name of the image object on the card. The images are not the
same size, and over images the object appears to drift up and to the
left. As this effect does not happen with identically-sized images, I
suspect it
Thanks Philip. That indeed does seem to be the problem. Thanks
for the suggested fix as well.
On Sunday, January 27, 2002, at 10:12 AM, Philip Chumbley wrote:
To illustrate the situation in one dimension, if a line is 99
pixels wide,
its centerpoint is at 50 with 49 pixels before and 49
To be fair: most of metacard is coded in metatalk; it is a
boot-strapped language, much like many of the TILs (threaded
interpreted languages) of yesteryears (e.g., forth, apl).
On Thursday, November 14, 2002, at 10:01 AM,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| MC, as well, is also coded in C, so in
All,
I'm baffled. I know other commands, such as offset, are faster and
more useful, but I was trying to use the metacard (2.4.3, Mac OS X
10.2.3) find command and discovered that for some reason it doesn't
work, or at least I can't get it to work. I finally stripped it down
to a simple
On Tuesday, March 18, 2003, at 10:03 AM, WA wrote:
Hi again,
If Mr J. Vokey is right about the permutations Mr E. Engle really wants
then things could have looked like this:
on mousUp
put perm(fld in) into fld out
end mouseUp
function perm factors
put the length of factors into x
put
Here's my task: I've got two LARGE text files, one a spelling
dictionary (from Excalibur) and the other a dictionary of lexical
frequencies (i.w., item and frequency); there over 113,000 unique words
(as lines) in the first, and about a million different entries (as
separate lines) in the
I agree wholeheartedly with everything Wilhelm Sanke wrote in his
recent post about the functionality of MC vs. RR. I, too, still use MC
preferentially, as do my colleagues and students. Its interface is
clean, fast, and easily extensible. In contrast, RR is cluttered,
confusing and slow,
Funny!
BTW, although `Vokey' is an old English name (and unduly common in
Newfoundland), my mother was a Scot, but she only tried make her
children eat haggis *once*. We all survived, although memory of the
experience still gives me shivers. I still think, however, that the RR
interface
Sorry, Richard, I did mean to reply in the affirmative: a one-click
solution for setting up MC would be welcome.
On 31-Aug-06, at 11:00 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would be interesting to learn of anything you find there that's
attractive. MC is getting old, and the more they make
As a Canadian Scot, I take serious offence at this comment: Bagpipes
by definition are always in tune; it is the ignorant listeners who
aren't. Besides, I heard the Romans left because of the advent of
the accordian... Now, as a one time player of same, that is an
instrument deserving of
The recent discussion over one user's less than happy switch to the
Rev IDE from that of Metacard leads me to add my little bit of
history. I have tried and tried the Rev IDE, and even beta-tested
for the original (see the lengthy thank-you list in Rev), and I have
praised Runtime
Metacardians,
This is just so strange. Metacard IDE version: 2.8.4, Engine
version 2.8.1, Build number 470. Leopard (OS X 10.5) on a dual-intel
Macbook. All buttons, etc. of the IDE look normal (i.e., rounded-3D),
and the defaults have the throbbing blue. As do pre-created buttons
Same on Mac OS X
On 2-Nov-08, at 11:00 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Send metacard mailing list submissions to
metacard@lists.runrev.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard
or, via email, send a message
I, too, prefer the MC IDE, as do the students in the lab, despite my
best efforts to get them to start with the Rev IDE (assuming that they
will prefer what they first learn, and that my preference is the bias
of my original MC learning). Nope, within a few months, I find them
using the
Me too. Well, actually, 100%. I never use the Rev IDE to program
in. Indeed, the only thing I use it for is to execute Jacqueline's
metacard_setup stack to licence the engine for MC IDE!
On 6-Oct-09, at 11:00 AM, metacard-requ...@lists.runrev.com wrote:
For a number of - maybe very
24 matches
Mail list logo
