On Thu, 21 Sep 2000, David Bovill wrote:
I've done some testing on a simple stack and if you put the following lines
of code in a group on a card:
1) "btn x of me" will uniquely refer to the object.
2) "btn x of the owner of me" will not.
That's because "me" is a function, which
Agreed. Any objection to changing behavior of "the owner" property so
that it returns the long id of the object instead of the name? Seems
to me that this will eliminate the ambiguity problem with minimal
backward compatibility problems...
Regards,
Scott
I'd buy you a huge bunch of
If you are creating an object that you want a user to be able to paste into
his own stack, or if you simply want to have tow groups on the same card and
be able to use the clone command to achieve this, and have everything
guaranteed to still work...
The group must be independent of the
