Re: Building MetaCard 6.0 OSS

2013-04-13 Thread Richard Gaskin

On 4/13/13 8:12 AM, Richmond wrote:

Having tried this using Jacque's tried and tested
stack I got an error message on trying to open
the new version of MC:

object:  stack /.../.../MC6_OPEN/mchome.mc

Line: 31  Column: 20  Processing Token:

Richmond.


The number of volunteers available to maintain the MC IDE is low.  What 
do you need to do in MC that can't be done in LC?  Maybe there's a most 
cost-effective way to achieve your goal within LC.


--
 Richard Gaskin
 Fourth World Systems
 Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web
 
 ambassa...@fourthworld.comhttp://www.FourthWorld.com

___
metacard mailing list
metacard@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard


Re: Building MetaCard 6.0 OSS

2013-04-13 Thread Richmond

On 04/13/2013 07:34 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:

On 4/13/13 8:12 AM, Richmond wrote:

Having tried this using Jacque's tried and tested
stack I got an error message on trying to open
the new version of MC:

object:  stack /.../.../MC6_OPEN/mchome.mc

Line: 31  Column: 20  Processing Token:

Richmond.


The number of volunteers available to maintain the MC IDE is low. What 
do you need to do in MC that can't be done in LC?  Maybe there's a 
most cost-effective way to achieve your goal within LC.




Nothing at all; but I still don't know why people climb Mount Everest :)

Richmond.

___
metacard mailing list
metacard@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard


Re: Building MetaCard 6.0 OSS

2013-04-13 Thread Vokey, John
Same here.  I suspect it has something to do with the (former) licensing code, 
but the constant throwing of the error makes it impossible to open the script 
to edit it.

As to Richard's question:  I don't build standalones, I run all my stacks in 
the IDE (i.e., the original Hypercard model), as do many of my colleagues.  
Metacard makes that easy as the IDE stays out of the way.  Not so in the LC 
IDE.  Furthermore, I find the LC IDE to too busy (indeed, annoying) when I am 
coding/running.

On 2013-04-13, at 11:00 AM, metacard-requ...@lists.runrev.com
 wrote:

 Having tried this using Jacque's tried and tested
 stack I got an error message on trying to open
 the new version of MC:
 
 object:  stack /.../.../MC6_OPEN/mchome.mc
 
 Line: 31  Column: 20  Processing Token:
 
 Richmond.

--
Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

-Dr. John R. Vokey




___
metacard mailing list
metacard@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard


Re: Building MetaCard 6.0 OSS

2013-04-13 Thread FlexibleLearning.com
 On 04/13/2013 07:34 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
  On 4/13/13 8:12 AM, Richmond wrote:
  Having tried this using Jacque's tried and tested
  stack I got an error message on trying to open
  the new version of MC:
 
  object:  stack /.../.../MC6_OPEN/mchome.mc
 
  Line: 31  Column: 20  Processing Token:
 
  Richmond.
 
  The number of volunteers available to maintain the MC IDE is low. What
  do you need to do in MC that can't be done in LC?  Maybe there's a
  most cost-effective way to achieve your goal within LC.
 

 Nothing at all; but I still don't know why people climb Mount Everest :)

 Richmond.

I have to agree with Richmond. The non-impacting MC IDE works for me; the LC
IDE does not. I guess I shall have to await the commercial release of LC
(when my 3yr licence kicks in from kickStarter) to find out if we can
continue with our old friend in this brand new world. Meanwhile, I so most
sincerely hope we shall be able to maintain compatibility.

Hugh Senior
FLCo


___
metacard mailing list
metacard@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard


Re: Building MetaCard 6.0 OSS

2013-04-13 Thread J. Landman Gay

On 4/13/13 12:36 PM, Vokey, John wrote:

Same here.  I suspect it has something to do with the (former)
licensing code, but the constant throwing of the error makes it
impossible to open the script to edit it.


I agree it's likely due to the missing security module. If there's a 
locked stack in the message path, and the licensing stack would be part 
of that, there isn't anything we can do about it. The engine does not 
contain any code to deal with passworded stacks. The LiveCode IDE 
ignores those; the MC IDE doesn't know anything about it and won't run 
without a license.


You'll need to use the commercial version of LiveCode with the MC IDE.

--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com

___
metacard mailing list
metacard@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard