Re: mcStandaloneBuilder b1 posted

2011-07-04 Thread Wilhelm Sanke
On Sun, 03 Jul 2011, Ken Ray wrote: Sorry Wilhelm, misread your post - ignore what I said in my previous post to the list. Not at all, Ken. Your hint to the Livecode tab in the new preferences was new information for me, as it places the path to the preferred Livecode version then

Re: mcStandaloneBuilder b1 posted

2011-07-04 Thread Ken Ray
Our new SB could maybe be considered to possess a similar simplicity, but it is surely not obvious, unless of course you know which entries are required. After a lot of trial and error - yesterday and today - I think I found out the minimal requirements to build a standalone (I am though

Re: mcStandaloneBuilder b1 posted

2011-07-04 Thread rob . tucker
Wilhelm, I had the same problem with an old stack, Saving the stack in MC fixed it. Rob ___ metacard mailing list metacard@lists.runrev.com http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard

Re: mcStandaloneBuilder b1 posted

2011-07-03 Thread Wilhelm Sanke
Many thanks to Richard and Ken for the release of the new Standalone Builder and the 4.1 IDE, not to forget the new Metacard Setup 2.01 by Jacqueline - and I assume that the preparations by Klaus were helpful for the developments of these tools.. The releases coincided with a palpable

Re: mcStandaloneBuilder b1 posted

2011-07-03 Thread Ken Ray
For LiveCode Folder/Bundle - in the upper region of the Standalone Builder - I had first chosen the Livecode runtime folder where the standalone files reside - following in essence the procedure I had used before in the 3.0 MC IDE, namely locating the necessary file standalone. Instead we

Re: mcStandaloneBuilder b1 posted

2011-07-03 Thread Ken Ray
Sorry Wilhelm, misread your post - ignore what I said in my previous post to the list. My proposal is to allow to point to the runtime folder only, which could be copied into the Metacard folder. This would mean that you need not have both the full Metacard and Livecode installations on the