[Metakit] Starting work on a Java version of Metakit

2005-05-12 Thread Bruce A . Johnson
I like Metakit so much, but can't use it directly with my Java software, that I've decided to begin writing a version in Java. I've got a reasonable amount of progress so far in being able to open and read a Metakit database. My initial goal is to be able to fully support read-only access

Re: [Metakit] Starting work on a Java version of Metakit

2005-05-12 Thread Bruce A . Johnson
My plan was to, as you say, literally re-implement Metakit in Java. I'm not interested in a solution that is not in pure Java. As to your qualms. 1) I agree that keeping the features in step with Metakit would require a significant effort. On the other hand, at the moment I am not using nearly

Re: [Metakit] Starting work on a Java version of Metakit

2005-05-12 Thread gary . h . merrill
Just a couple of comments that you can take for whatever they are worth, and not intended to start a best language war: I can well imagine that relatively direct Java access to Metakit databases would be welcomed by a significant number of Java developers. I encourage this effort. There is more

Re: [Metakit] Starting work on a Java version of Metakit

2005-05-12 Thread Bruce A . Johnson
Hi Gary, I appreciate your comments and have no interest in a best language war as well. There are certainly many others that are quite interested in that and we can leave it to them. I guess my bottom line is that for me Java works very well. I do write compute intensive applications, often

Re: [Metakit] Starting work on a Java version of Metakit

2005-05-12 Thread Jean-Claude Wippler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [... to java or not to java ...] I respect your concerns. I can well imagine that relatively direct Java access to Metakit databases would be welcomed by a significant number of Java developers. I encourage this effort. Me too. And if there is someone out there who

Re: [Metakit] Starting work on a Java version of Metakit

2005-05-12 Thread Jean-Claude Wippler
Brian Kelley wrote: And jcw, could I see the python only reader please, please :) Yeah, I was afraid you'd ask. Took me ages to find it on an old CD backup, even though I'm pretty well organized w.r.t. my backups these days (it's hard to find things by location when you don't know *where*