After clarification on distutils-sig, I suggest the following patch
--
Misha
--- setup.py.orig 2003-10-01 20:34:20.0 +0100
+++ setup.py2003-10-01 20:35:21.0 +0100
@@ -162,8 +162,6 @@
author = metakit.__author__,
author_email =
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 01:53:58PM -0500, Nicholas Riley wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 06:35:35PM +0100, Mikhail Sobolev wrote:
Can you please be a bit more specific: did you change the files outside
of mk4py? I mean, can I just take the tree that corresponds to the
python interface and
Mikhail,
did you change any files outside of mk4py distribution?
FYI, see
http://trixie.triqs.com/pipermail/metakit/2003-September/001409.html -
I posted a patch, i.e. all the differences in one file. You can see
exactly what Nicholas did.
-jcw
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 12:47:17PM +0200, Jean-Claude Wippler wrote:
Mikhail,
did you change any files outside of mk4py distribution?
FYI, see
http://trixie.triqs.com/pipermail/metakit/2003-September/001409.html -
I posted a patch, i.e. all the differences in one file. You can see
Hi,
My only changes outside the Python area were not source-related, they
were just build system-related. The differences you saw were most
likely because you compared against the release version, whereas I had
updated to the latest CVS version.
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 11:39:44AM +0100, Mikhail
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 09:03:10AM +0200, PieterB wrote:
Do I need to upgrade autoconf, or should I change something?
Thanks for all your effort! It would be great if the default metakit
would work with Python out of the box.
No, actually, I think downgrading autoconf would have worked. There
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 01:10:22AM -0500, Nicholas Riley wrote:
No, actually, I think downgrading autoconf would have worked. There
were some constructs in configure.in which were deprecated and no
longer worked properly, and some macros were in a place where they
didn't make any sense. In
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 06:35:35PM +0100, Mikhail Sobolev wrote:
Can you please be a bit more specific: did you change the files outside
of mk4py? I mean, can I just take the tree that corresponds to the
python interface and build it against the library installed in my
system (debian
Hi,
Only about a year late, I've fixed everything that's annoyed me about
Mk4py. There's quite a bit here, as I often stumbled on one bug or
brokenness as I was trying to fix another.
Since I've also had to move and rename some files, I don't think it'd
work well to provide a patch, so I've
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 01:40:04AM -0500, Nicholas Riley wrote:
- FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT, Python 2.3 - everything works, limited testing.
I tried compiling it on FreeBSD 5.1 RELEASE using cd builds ;
../unix/configure and with ../unix/configure --with-python=/usr
but both fail during configure.
Nicholas,
Thanks for this great contribution.
I'll go through this to understand all the changes. In the meantime.
I'm attaching a diff with the latest code in CVS, it wasn't so hard
after all, and after editing out the differences reported for
auto-generated stuff such as configure, it
11 matches
Mail list logo
