Written by Matteo?
Cheers,
Pete
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 19:17:10 -0400
Subject: [meteorite-list] THE UNDERWATER ARTEFACT IS FOUND, WHETHER BUT THAT?
Okay, we all know that this guy ain't going to find a meteorite, but this
Good Morning All
I have auctions ending tonight, eBay ID catchafallingstar.com. Most started
just at 99 Cents!!!
http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZcatchafallingstar.com
I would like to take this opportunity to announce our newest planetary coin
= NWA 482 Lunar. List price is $100-
Dear List and Maskelynite-rich eucrite lovers,
In my busy week, and after writing the description for my new
Maskelynite-rich Polymict Breccia Eucrite, NWA 4883, I forgot I had earlier
taken some very close-up photos of interesting features on a slice. Here
they are and worth a look:
NWA
Good morning list.I took my 77 gram allende slice and
put it under a microscope.What a wonder to see.This
piece has alot of small cai's and next to them are
lots of small crater like drop off's.Almost crystal
like.Truly a remarkable meteorite.Also when polished,a
cai universe.
Steve
Arctic Impact Crater Lake Reveals Interglacial
Cycles in Sediments Univerity of Arkansas,
December 11, 2007
http://dailyheadlines.uark.edu/11974.htm
Pingualuit Crater Lake Project
http://www.cen.ulaval.ca/pingualuit/index.html
Yours
Paul H.
Volume 339, No. 14-15 (November 2007), issue of Comptes
Rendus Geosciences has a few articles about Formation
du système solaire : approche cosmochimique dans le c
onteste astrophysique. They include:
1. Short-lived radioactive nuclides in meteorites and early
solar system processes by Marc
Greg Hupe introduces:
spiders in space ;)
http://www.lunarrock.com/nwa4883/nwa4883mag1.jpg
Stefan
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
i just bought a 66 pound campo with LOADS of visible,
silicate inclusions. THIS METEORITE IS TOO BIG AND
HEAVY FOR ME TO PRACTICALLY OWN. i have never owned a
skyrock this big i had no idea the dead weight of
these was such. i have a bad back and can't move it
around, etc. value= $2,000 i would
why do all nws'a weather down to basically, iorn ore?
even achindrites do?
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
Hi all -
Looks to me like vaporization of impactor, the bits
falling back to ground several hundred kilometers
away.
I think there will be a search for an iron impact in
that range. Maybe survivals of fossil irons, ala
Canyon Diablo, but Canada is not as dry as Arizona.
we'll see...
E.P.
the post office said if i can get it in the box, they
will ship it for $8.95!
--- mckinney trammell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
i just bought a 66 pound campo with LOADS of
visible,
silicate inclusions. THIS METEORITE IS TOO BIG AND
HEAVY FOR ME TO PRACTICALLY OWN. i have never owned
a
E.P., All,
Well, that hardly seems likely; no crater-forming mechanism would
create iron pellets of ejecta such as what occurred on those tusks,
and the likelihood of their being caused by a low-altitude airburst,
though intriguing, seems physically impossible, at least if we're
talking about a
I also agree. Any airburst or cratering event sufficiently energetic to create
Meteor-Crater-esque iron spherules and fire them, still smoking, into mammoth
tusks, should result in more definite signs of concussion and heat damage to
the other bones. We should be finding, in conjunction
Hello Tracy, All,
I agree, but the main problem is that the spherule-type material from
Canyon Diablo wasn't fired out of anything; it condensed out of a
cloud of vapour that formed as a result of the meteorites vaporization
upon impact. They weren't necessarily hot to any appreciable degree
when
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:41:54 +, you wrote:
Playing Devil's advocate for a moment, is there a chance the author is
fudging the findings? Could the proposed results be replicated by, say,
firing a shotgun shell full of coarse iron filings at a tusk, like using
paper
from the appropriate
I can only repeat my urging to watch the National Geographic Channel
Explorer , Mammoth Extinction which addresses many of these questions.
Repeated the weekend!
Jerry Flaherty
- Original Message -
From: Darren Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tracy latimer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
National Geographic Channel RIGHT NOW as I write.
Jerry Flaherty
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Dec. 13, 2007
Grey Hautaluoma
Headquarters, Washington
202-358-0668
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DC Agle
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.
818-393-9011
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nancy Neal
Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md.
301-286-0039
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lee Tune
University of Maryland,
Hi, List
Well, I knew we were going to get back to those
mammoth teeth... How about the history of the
whole crazy thing? Who is Richard B. Firestone?
Firestone is a well-established scientist, long at
the Lawrence Radiation Lab at UC Berkeley, and
for the DOE, Editor of the standard reference
Hi List. I added about 13 new pics of my collection such like Barwell,
Bereba, Bouvante DAG 412, New Halfa, New Orleans, Oriented Millbillillie,
Nogoya-Cold Bokkeveld-Boriskino, Norton County, Pesyanoe, Tatahouine and a
very rare Russian Stamp
Just click on the site address below
and then
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 19:30:26 -0600, you wrote:
Well, I knew we were going to get back to those
mammoth teeth... How about the history of the
whole crazy thing? Who is Richard B. Firestone?
I thought this sounded like the same song, different day! Anyway, his fitting
the fragged tusks data into
Hello Sterling, Tracy, All,
Sterling, you said, As always, when people dislike an explanation, they
do not search for an explanation that works, they attack the facts for
demanding one.
I agree...kind of. While I do agree that attacking an existing
hypothesis may well be easier than coming up
Hi Jason and List
In the archaeology world, there are camps. And if you want to advance, you
snuggle up to those with the leading theories and make camp as it were.
When an idea or finding comes along which challenges these leading theories,
instead of investigating, they argue from the gray
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 19:30:26 -0600, you wrote:
And, Firestone has a popular-market book out now (of course):
http://www.amazon.com/Cycle-Cosmic-Catastrophes-Stone-Age-Changed/dp/1591430615
Hm. Recommended by the people that bought his book:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0743491904/
Hi, Jason, List,
No, no, I never said, nor meant, that everybody
has to come with Theory, quantity: one (1) before
criticizing the existing (inadequate) hypothesis. Criticize
away! You don't have to come up with new ones...
I was objecting to the notion that the evidence was
possibly
Hi, Darren,
Yes, there's nothing like supernova to bring out
the whackoes! Partly since they can claim almost
any effect they want to, as people are not that
familiar with supernovae. But they make a fine
super-scary hook on which to hang your private
fantasies.
One correction to my
Hi, List,
It seems that people are always looking for scale cubes.
When they become available, they sell out, then somebody
always complains they didn't get any.
So, I noticed that there are scale cubes on eBay again,
and I pass the good news along in case you're one of those
somebodies:
27 matches
Mail list logo
