My last post on the subject,
I just had a lengthy conversation with Dr. Bunch just as few minutes ago
about the non-paired stones NWA 1839/3133.
Some statements made by Dr. Bunch:
He absolutely and unequivocally disagrees with David Weir's last post the
List.
He has access to the latest
Adam Hupe wrote:
My last post on the subject,
I just had a lengthy conversation with Dr. Bunch just as few minutes ago
about the non-paired stones NWA 1839/3133.
Some statements made by Dr. Bunch:
He absolutely and unequivocally disagrees with David Weir's last post
the List.
He has
Dr Bunch's exact quote The petrography, mineral chemistry and OXYGEN
ISOTOPSE clearly indicate that NWA 1839 and NWA 3133 are NOT paired,
period! bingo!
*all caps mine*
Adam,as i recall when we had discussed this matter previously you had said
that further testing of 1839 - specifically
3 matches
Mail list logo