=On Mon, 11/3/08, Mr EMan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...so unless you can underpin your claims with something such as an absolute
formation age from 100,000 to 300,000 to 4.3± billion years...
In further reading, I am unable to locate lunar crystallization ages but they
allude to 4.2 and 3.9
Hi Group!
I ran across this one on eBay today :
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=350119620351
Something about it doesn't ring true.
There is a lot of quasi-scientific mumbo jumbo in the listing.
Is this for real or some highly-misinformed individual?
Regards,
MikeG
Hi Mike - I concur, the whole picture looks strange to me. A 5 ton lunar
meteorite in one piece? Where were the O2 analyses done? There are only a
few trustworthy labs that can do O2 analyses. In any case, I don't think the
reported O2 data are that discriminating between lunar and terrestrial.
doesn´t this lunar have a name, with all this classification done???
Stefan the lunatic
Hi Group!
I ran across this one on eBay today :
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=350119620351
Something about it doesn't ring true.
There is a lot of quasi-scientific mumbo jumbo in
On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 09:06:36 -0700, you wrote:
Looks like a duck, walks like a duck, but it doesn't quack like a duck.
A rule of thumb I have for anything is-- if it writes like a duck, it probably
should be avoided. And that auction description is written as a duck had wrote
it-- meaning
THIS BEAUTY!
(but you do need some form of head trauma)
- Original Message -
From: Stefan Brandes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2008 10:50 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Unusual new lunar or hokum?
doesn´t this lunar have a name
.
This guy is a liar, ebay knows it and has done nothing about it.
--- On Mon, 11/3/08, Michael Gilmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Michael Gilmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [meteorite-list] Unusual new lunar or hokum?
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Date: Monday, November 3, 2008
Hi All
This guy has been mentioned several times on the list and is a well
known scam artist. In fact he is so well know Randy Korotev has give
him his own page;
http://meteorites.wustl.edu/meteorwrongs/m239.htm
It is too bad some one possibly bought a piece of his garbage;
Hola,
This fellow's been selling complete crap for the past year or so.
Terrestrial slag as a new plessitic octahedrite, Campo del Cielo's
as Canyon Diablo's (a difference of $200-250/kg in value), and bits of
terrestrial metamorphic/igneous crap (see the link) as lunar material.
He's repeatedly
, and they are in agreement with my classification.
If you have other questions please feel free to contact me. Mitch Minor office
(815)740-3834 cell(815)545-5803
--- On Mon, 11/3/08, Ted Bunch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Ted Bunch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Unusual new lunar or hokum
to contact me.
Mitch Minor office (815)740-3834 cell(815)545-5803
--- On Mon, 11/3/08, Ted Bunch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Ted Bunch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Unusual new lunar or hokum?
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Date: Monday
.
I will call you out here and publicly on this.
You sent me 5 grams of lunar material that is not real.
You are a liar and a fraud.
--- On Mon, 11/3/08, Patricia Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Patricia Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Unusual new lunar or hokum
- Original Message -
From: Patricia Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ted Bunch [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 11:17 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Unusual new lunar or hokum?
Back in 2005 Ted Bunch confirmed this specimen as a 100
Mitch, Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. We would like to SEE
the proof and I would like the following conflicts resolved to win me over. You
could foreclose all the nay saying and skeptics by resolving the following
conflicts:
Six+ conflicts in your claims for the Illinois
; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Unusual new lunar or hokum?
Mitch, Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. We would like to SEE
the proof and I would like the following conflicts resolved to win me over.
You could foreclose all the nay saying and skeptics by resolving
15 matches
Mail list logo
