Re: [meteorite-list] 10 Mislabeled Meteorites - Meteorite lot $1.99 starting bid

johns...@mail.com> Cc: "metlist" <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com> Envoyé: Jeudi 17 Août 2017 02:13:30 Objet: Re: [meteorite-list] 10 Mislabeled Meteorites - Meteorite lot $1.99 starting bid Thank you Luc and John, you're both obviously smarter than I am. But like I said, If som

Re: [meteorite-list] 10 Mislabeled Meteorites - Meteorite lot $1.99 starting bid

Hi john, I think he was joking. I very much appreciated your input. On Aug 16, 2017 6:01 PM, "Bigjohn Shea" wrote: > So my crime is what...? > > That I didn't want people to think they were "mislabeled" when they really > weren't? > > -chin scratching- > > Okay... Well

Re: [meteorite-list] 10 Mislabeled Meteorites - Meteorite lot $1.99 starting bid

"Dhofar" may be a bit complicated ;-) "Hamada Du Draa" is El Hammami (H4) 16.8.2017, 23:34, Ruben Garcia via Meteorite-list kirjoitti: These specimens are not in the meteorite bulletin as they are labeled. This means that the provisional name or the field name was not used as was assumed at

Re: [meteorite-list] 10 Mislabeled Meteorites - Meteorite lot $1.99 starting bid

It's alright Ruben. All's good. I was joking as well On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 6:03 PM, Ruben Garcia wrote: > Hi john, > > I think he was joking. I very much appreciated your input. > > On Aug 16, 2017 6:01 PM, "Bigjohn Shea" wrote: >> >> So my

Re: [meteorite-list] 10 Mislabeled Meteorites - Meteorite lot $1.99 starting bid

No crime. Just making a statement John. People are so edgy these days with everything On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 6:01 PM, Bigjohn Shea wrote: > So my crime is what...? > > That I didn't want people to think they were "mislabeled" when they really > weren't? > > -chin

Re: [meteorite-list] 10 Mislabeled Meteorites - Meteorite lot $1.99 starting bid

Yes Ruben, it was a bonus for those that wanted to research it. I had at least 90% which was obvious but Big John decided to blow it but that's good. Now you're going to get a lot more bids On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Ruben Garcia via Meteorite-list

Re: [meteorite-list] 10 Mislabeled Meteorites - Meteorite lot $1.99 starting bid

So my crime is what...? That I didn't want people to think they were "mislabeled" when they really weren't? -chin scratching- Okay... Well have a good night! Cheers, John Sent using the mail.com mail app On 8/16/17 at 7:55 PM, John Cabassi wrote: > Yes Ruben, it was a bonus for those

Re: [meteorite-list] 10 Mislabeled Meteorites - Meteorite lot $1.99 starting bid

Thank you Luc and John, you're both obviously smarter than I am. But like I said, If someone is willing to take a few minutes to do research they might get a good deal. On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Bigjohn Shea wrote: > ALOT of them are not mislabelled, just

Re: [meteorite-list] 10 Mislabeled Meteorites - Meteorite lot $1.99 starting bid

ALOT of them are not mislabelled, just abbreviated. Great Sand Sea 012, from the Egyptian DCA Great Sand Sea, that specimen simply never got classified as the official DCA skips from 009 to 019. Tagounite 001 and 019 are just informally numbered specimens from the unofficial DCA of Tagounite.

Re: [meteorite-list] 10 Mislabeled Meteorites - Meteorite lot $1.99 starting bid

Hi Ruben, The angrite Sahara 99555 is not mislabeled! ;-) Here is the link on the MetBul: https://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/metbull.php?code=23065 Regards, Luc Labenne Luc Labenne Meteorites Http://www.Meteorites.tv Facebook.com/labenne.meteorites