> But, the matter is essentially a dead issue,
> important primarily to the individuals involved.
> I am much more interested in 2003EL61 itself!
> Its shape, for example. Now, there's a puzzle
> worthy of puzzlement.
Hi Sterling,
I agree to this, the issue of who gets discovery credit in it
Hi, Marco
While I am far from a working knowledge
of the astrometric procedures, no practical
experience doing so, in other words, I note
that in addition to the the rough pointing data
you refer to, it appears that among the files
accessed were the ccd processing logs.
As I said earlier:
2 matches
Mail list logo
