So, basically, if the oft-discussed laws, that may or may not be in
place, today, are actually in place, if you're not a landowner (with a
certain amount of good fortune,) and only a person with a decent eye
for the irregular, or as most of us would probably say special, you,
to make a
You might as well be saying Look how smart (you are.) I don't know
who is alerting Anne Black to these ads, but to me, at the least, and
I would predict I am not the only one, the person is an utter
nuisance. Regarding this latest ad, it would be too ridiculous to
comment upon it, so I will
FYI Shawn, IIRC, They had reported finding a second
quasicrystal-containing-specimen around a year ago (or so). I am not
sure, therefore, what is with the flurry of recent articles. It sure
looks like something a lot of meteoriticists, as well as enthusiasts,
would like to get their hands on,
I agree, John. It was there. Read it all carefully please, everyone,
and we need not continue it one bit, imo.
kind regards,
Peter
On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 1:28 PM, John Lutzon j...@lutzon.com wrote:
This thread needs to end.
- Original Message -
From: Peter Richards via Meteorite-list
.
--
-
Web - http://www.galactic-stone.com
Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/galacticstone
Twitter - http://twitter.com/galacticstone
Pinterest - http://pinterest.com/galacticstone
-
On 6/7/15, Peter Richards via Meteorite-list
On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Peter Richards via Meteorite-list
meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com wrote:
Mike, I think your approach is great for novices. I know that not only
you but many professional meteoricists have your hardline, barely
logical, if so, preconceived, paper form reply
://www.facebook.com/galacticstone
Twitter - http://twitter.com/galacticstone
Pinterest - http://pinterest.com/galacticstone
-
On 6/7/15, Peter Richards via Meteorite-list
meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com wrote:
Hello Michael, no, but I
To whom it may concern, I am offering this link, for the benefit of
representatives of accredited educational and scientific institutions,
displaying a stone which an Actlabs (of Lancaster, Ontario) report has
identified to me as a granite, which, is almost definitely meteoritic,
which I say due
Okay Elton, I have added a higher res photo and I have added what I
received from sample testing at Actlabs for anyone who is curious.
Yes, I am a bit lost, but does it still seem meteoritic? It does, for
a desert-varnish idea seems to fall a bit flat, for one. I have been
fooled before, in
trinkets?
A,asking what makes it on the list these days.
Sent from my iPad
On Jun 6, 2015, at 8:48 PM, Peter Richards via Meteorite-list
meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com wrote:
To whom it may concern, I am offering this link, for the benefit of
representatives of accredited educational
Elton, or Ms. Treman (b. 1953), or whoever you are, for all many of us
know, the infamous Steve Curry, a judge or whatever he may claim to
be, is a fabrication and an extension of the flashy language you
people with professions in the field may use: ie. theatrics. Give it a
rest, for your phrasing
It seems as if any president who thought of this idea, or had it
suggested to them, would do this under any circumstances, practically
speaking, That is. It's a publicity activity, wherein families who go
on trips to the national parks recall that individual who "protected"
them in a positive
As mentioned perhaps in list archives, this is within range of Park
Forest, according to data I found on strewn field sizes, as
recognized, too bad the citation isn't readily available. I was
distracted while doing research in many ways, for years, and seemingly
with good reason I didn't overdo
Hello, new photos and I put no price. I have the witnesses and again, note
photo..
Actually, incidentally, there was another spot, meaning presumably another
stone was there, although the manager of the establishment owning the lot
mentioned nothing about any doorstop or anything who knows, but as
14 matches
Mail list logo
