Hi,
"Suspected extraterrestial impact crater reported from North Korea"
should read "Suspected extraterrestial impact crater reported from
South. Korea."
Apologies for the brain fart.
Paul H.
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
In my last post, I wrote:
> Pristine Space Rock Offers NASA Scientists
> Peek at Evolution of Life’s Building Blocks
> By Lonnie Shekhtman, NASA’s Goddard Space
> Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md., August 21, 2020
>
Hi,
On 6/9/19 9:18 AM, Paul wrote:
> Jaye, M., 2019. The Flooding of the Mediterranean
> Basin at the Younger-Dryas Boundary. Mediterranean
> Archaeology & Archaeometry, 19(1).
> http://maajournal.com/Issues/2019/Vol19-1/7_Jaye%2019(1).pdf
The URL for the paper was mangled. It can be accessed
That last message list the price for both lots of slices as $280.
It should have said $200
__
Visit our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/meteoritecentral and the
Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
All,
I made a mistake in the list write-up announcing the sale of my book. It
should have read 257 pages, not 157 pages.
Thank you to all those who have purchased one. See you all in Tucson,
Frank
__
Visit our Facebook page
guess that "climate change" is Answer
No. 51.
Sterling Webb
-
-Original Message-
From: Meteorite-list [mailto:meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com] On
Behalf Of Paul via Meteorite-list
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2016 7
In "The Aliens are Silent Because They are Dead," I wrote:
> The aliens are silent because they're dead
> Life on other planets would probably go
> extinct soon after its origin, due to runaway
> heating or cooling on their fledgling planets.
> Australian National University, January 21, 2016
The age of the craters is given as 458 ma, not 470 ma.
I misread the text.
Yours,
Paul H.
__
Visit our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/meteoritecentral and the
Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
In my last email, I meant to write;
In my last email, I totally garbled the last citation by being
half asleep at the computer. The properly formatted
version of it should be:
Torsvik, T. H. H. Amundsen6, E. H. Hartz, F. Corfu
N. Kusznir, C. Gaina, P. V. Doubrovine, B. Steinberger,
L. D. Ashwal,
Torsvik, T. H. H. Amundsen6, E. H. Hartz, F. Corfu,
In my last email, I totally garbled the last citation by being
half asleep at the computer. The properly formatted
version of it should be:
N. Kusznir, C. Gaina, P. V. Doubrovine, B. Steinberger,
L. D. Ashwal, and B. Jamtveit, 2013, A
In New PhD. Dissertation About Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis at
http://www.mail-archive.com/meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com/msg118345.html ,
I posted the incorrect URL for a poster about the Younger Dryas Impact
Hypothesis. The correct URL is:
van Hoesel, A., 2012, The Younger Dryas impact
In my last post, I gave the wrong URLs for an interesting
paper about the limitations of using Google Scholar to
search the scientific literature. The paper is:
DeGraff, J. V., N. DeGraff, and H. C. Romesburg,
2013, Literature searches with Google Scholar:
Knowing what you are and are not
Correction - the updates are not just from NWA. They are from deserts
around the world.
--
-
Web - http://www.galactic-stone.com
Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/galacticstone
Twitter - http://twitter.com/galacticstone
Pinterest -
Sorry - I realized my wording sounded like CJ had sent the meteorites
to me - She only sent me the PHOTOS - CJ, herself, has the meteorites and
Will be shipping directly to buyers. (I am just handling the website
Work for her - they obviously could not wait until the next Tucson
Meteorite Auction
For clarification
- Not 300, there will be over 400 photos on automatic loop taking
about one hr to show all 400 photos (at about 7 seconds each) then start
over again. Twink will be available for any questions. (you all should
know that Twink gives and gives. She really is the Queen
I have just finished reading an article about Rabies.
IT was near the end when it said that the permeability
of the brain-blood barrier was the key to treating rabies.
Goran mentioned the incorrectness of the term
permeability.
I now concur with him.
I shall now endevor to use the term magnetic
Hello All,
I would like to make a quick correction to my AD this morning. I stated that
the NWA 482 slice was the last one I had, I do still have a 1.926g part
slice that I had with my OCD Sale items from a few weeks ago, it's just
not on eBay right now.
Sorry for my mistake, just want to
Greg, your integrity is already awesomeI smiled with pride when I read
this.
-Richard Montgomery
- Original Message -
From: Greg Hupé gmh...@centurylink.net
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 3:06 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] [Correction
In Holocene Extinctions and a different lake at
http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/meteorite-list/2011-November/081249.html ,
I left out the word lack in one sentence.
The sentence should read:
Also, despite the continuous record of lake sedimentation
recovered in cores from Lake Bonneville and
In [meteorite-list] Volcano... Or Giant Impact? at
http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/meteorite-list/2011-October/080668.html ,
I wrote,
“Another interesting paper is:
Reimold, W. U., V. von Brunn, and C. Koeberl, 1997, Are
Diamictites Impact Ejecta?—No Supporting Evidence from
South African
Hi List,
Sorry the link in my previous post did not work. Here is the corrected
one .
http://www.nevadameteorites.com/nevadameteorites/Trip_Report.html
http://www.nevadameteorites.com/nevadameteorites/ORDINARY_CHONDRITES.html
Sonny
__
Visit the
Thanks to all who responded to my non-magnetic meteorite question.
With a total weight of 27.37 grams the specimen in question has a direct
measured specific gravity of 2.59.
This would seem to rule-out both basalt (s.g. 2.7-3.1) and Tatahouine, a
Diogenite with a specific gravity range of at
Hi David,
When cutting meteorites (or suspected meteorites), use distilled water
only has a saw coolant/lubricant. Using anything else invites
contamination and instability in the specimen.
I own a large N52 rare earth magnet. It's quite powerful, and small
metal objects will fly across the
Also do not let 2 rare earth magnets slam together, I have had them shatter
like glass. They can be very unexpectedly dangerous. They are kinda like a
snake, they will get you when you least expect it!!
--
Stuart McDaniel
Lawndale, NC
IMCA#9052
http://www.facebook.com/Stuart.McDaniel.No.1
Greg assured me that Dave Gheesling was already aware of this second
lithology and it was definitely being found at Mifflin strewnfield.
Hello Carl, Greg All,
I haven't been following this thread, but the above sentence was just
brought to my attention and it needs a quick response.
One, I
In reading my post to the list, I made a glaring errorTodd Parker found the
108 gram Mifflin stone, not me. The typo reads that I found and should read
that he found Apologies to Todd and all for my error. Jack
__
Visit the Archives at
Sorry.
Please use this link http://tinyurl.com/kamilcraterzerzura instead of the
broken one in the previous post
Thanks,
Giancarlo Negro
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
..I know, contact me off list..not off lineaaarrggrr...
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Listoids.
The TKW of the Wickenburg was 9,2 kg. (not 92 kg.sorry)
Jan
IMCA 9833
Holland
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Hello,
Oops! I actually found 4 stones, for an average of 56 miles per stone... now
that is better!
Best Wishes
Michael Cottingham
_
The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail
Hi All,
Sent this reply to the list last night, but it appears to have
disappeared
into cyberspace. Resending:
- - - - -
Marvin is mistaken about the first radar return being at only
30,000 feet (assuming the article has quoted him correctly).
The initial radar return was at 28.3 km (~93,000')
Hi All,
Yes, my apologies -- I got the direction reversed. It was WNW to ESE.
(In my defense, I made the mistake of taking one of the early witness
reports at face value that the direction was going east to west.)
Based on the Doppler data, the westernmost returns are at much higher
altitude
Have you seen the ground there? Wunderbar!
Regards,
Eric
On 4/15/2010 1:17 PM, Matson, Robert D. wrote:
Hi All,
Yes, my apologies -- I got the direction reversed. It was WNW to ESE.
(In my defense, I made the mistake of taking one of the early witness
reports at face value that the direction
Hi, List,
Aluminum 26 decays to Magnesium 26, of course,
not Al-27, impossibly uphill. Thanks to Piper Hollier
for pointing out that cerebral short circuit. Long
emails at one in the morning invite the attack of
the dreaded brain fart.
Aluminum-26 to Mg-26 has a halflife of 710,000
years so its
Hi -
The correct date for Campo de Cielo appears to be 17 February, 2,325 BCE.
25 October, 2,360 BCE is for the Rio Cuarto Impacts, which also occurred at
Matawil.
My apology for the error.
E.P. Grondine
Man and Impact in the Americas
__
E.P., list,
out of curiousity: as you were previously talking about radio carbon dating, do
you pull that 17 February from the data provided by Cassidy et al (1972,
1996)?
Their radio carbon dating of charcoal fragments extracted from the bottom of
one of the craters gave an age of ~ 4,000
I need to correct my previous post, The Usselo Soil and the Younger
Dryas Extraterrestrial Impact Hypothesis. Its third paragraph should
read:
One important point that this paper makes is that what
has been called either the “Usselo Horizon” or “Usselo
Layer” is not a layer in terms of being a
Sorry
I meant to write.
Millbillillie's value is still compromised as a result of it once
having sold so inexpensively.
d,
Begin forwarded message:
From: Darryl Pitt dar...@dof3.com
Date: February 16, 2009 12:34:32 PM EST
To: Martin Altmann altm...@meteorite-martin.de
Cc:
Ending is tomorrow, Feb 17 (not 16)10:00 PM eastern time.
Thanks
**Need a job? Find an employment agency near you.
(http://yellowpages.aol.com/search?query=employment_agenciesncid=emlcntusyelp0003)
__
Dear Friends,
The title to my last post should be Moonrocks Suggests Early
Moon’s Core Had a Magnetic Field not Meteorites Suggests
Early Moon’s Core Had a Magnetic Field.
Sorry about the confusion.
Best Regards,
Paul H.
__
Dear List Members,
Correction:
In my Park Forest Garza... post, I stated Later today I have 42 auctions
ending... This should read, Later TOMORROW (Wednesday, March 26th)...
I apologize for my typo.
Happy bidding!
Greg
Dear List Members,
Tomorrow, March 26th, is the 5-year anniversary of
. And if that means you have to keep buying and selling
every piece you get so be it.
Walk Proud Steve !
- Original Message - From: steve arnold
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 1:13 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] correction on my sa
It will NOT end up on ebay.I just have to learn how to
type better or start using spell check better.I am
sorry for this post,but I had to correct my spellings.
steve
Steve R.Arnold,chicago,Ill,Usa!!
The Asteroid Belt!
so be it.
Walk Proud Steve !
- Original Message -
From: steve arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 1:13 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] correction on my sa
It will NOT end up on ebay.I just have to learn how to
type better
hello list members
i aporte here a correction to the main mass,
it's now 17875 gr , not the ten kilos and it was found
in erg chech, still dunes sand and land yellow color
stick at it, see photo here.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/azizhabibi/
thanks
aziz
habibi aziz
box 70 erfoud 52200
The correct number is NWA 4880 not 4480 as listed a
few times in my weekly advertisement. Please note
this correction.
Dear List Members,
I would like to take this opportunity to announce the
nomenclature for a new Martian Shergottite. For those
who purchased any of this new Martian
CORRECTION:
- Original Message -
From: Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mrs. Webb wrote:
Hi, Paul, EP, List,
That's = Mr. = Webb.
Sterling K. Webb
---
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
that's giubba
Jerry Flaherty
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Dear List Members. I have made a classic error in using the numbers NWA
2975 and NWA 2986 to describe the stones I am selling. I have no right to
use these numbers as they are owned by two well known and respected
meteorite dealers. I can say that the meteorites that I am selling are
LIKELY
Dear List Members. I have made a classic error in using the numbers NWA
2975 and NWA 2986 to describe the stones I am selling. I have no right to
use these numbers as they are owned by two well known and respected
meteorite dealers. I can say that the meteorites that I am selling are
LIKELY
Hello list and good evening.Being from illinois and
having been to 3 of the state strewfields,there are
already 3 iron meteorites classified already in
illinois.HAVANA (IIICD),SAINT AUGUSTINE (IID),and
finally WOODBINE (IAB).So if this was to be the next
iron from illinois,it would be the
Thank you Steve for that cogent analysis. I'll try to
not assume facts which are not in evidence.
As to understanding the math I totally agree. I
remember a time when one ad a day for a week plus
addemdums( sometimes 2 per day) still equaled one ad
per week. Must be that new darn math.
Elton
Hello Again All, Steve,
Well, you're...kind ofright.
Most people wouldn't qualify Havana as a meteorite, seeing as all
that's known of it is a few little indian beads made out of meteoric
iron. Yes, it's true, they did turn out to have a different chemical
composition than any known iron,
Jason, you are friends with John Wasson, he has had
Fredericksburg in his possesion for more than five
years.
Perhaps you could ask him why he refuses to submit it.
Michael Farmer
--- Jason Utas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Again All, Steve,
Well, you're...kind ofright.
Most people
=Allphot=pnt=nocode=11857
Regards,
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:23:20 -0700
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] correction on
illinois irons
Hello Again All, Steve,
Well, you're
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] correction on illinois irons
Hello Again All, Steve,
Well, you're...kind ofright.
Most people wouldn't qualify Havana as a meteorite, seeing as all
that's known of it is a few little indian beads made out of meteoric
iron
: [meteorite-list] correction on illinois irons
Hello Bill, All,
You should read what you post - check the references section of your
link and you get:
Never published in the Meteoritical Bulletin
Find references in NASA ADS
Haha, don't think I don't do my research too ;)
It's yet
]
Sent: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:23:20 -0700
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] correction on illinois irons
Hello Again All, Steve,
Well, you're...kind ofright.
Most people wouldn't qualify Havana as a meteorite, seeing as all
that's known of it is a few
=Allsrt=namecateg=Allmblist=Allphot=pnt=nocode=11857
Regards,
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:23:20 -0700
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] correction on
illinois irons
Hello Again All
=country=Allsrt=namecateg=Allmblist=Allphot=pnt=nocode=11857
Regards,
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:23:20 -0700
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] correction on
illinois
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:23:20 -0700
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] correction
on
illinois irons
Hello Again All, Steve,
Well, you're...kind
=nocode=11857
Regards,
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:23:20 -0700
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] correction
on
illinois irons
Hello
Hello again list.I stand corrected on my earlier
post.It is NWA 2965,the new EL6/7.It is not nwa
4265.That is my mistake.Thanks to bill for realizing
my mistake.There are so many # out there that you have
to be absolutley correct.
Steve R.Arnold,chicago,Ill,Usa!!
Collecting Meteorites since
when is this meteorite show going to be on T.V.?
Ruben Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all,
Parts of my last post were incorrect.
Steve set me straight, it should be:
The meteorite episode is a half hour long total (minus
commercials = 22 minutes of tape), and the Glorietta
splits that with
Hi all,
Parts of my last post were incorrect.
Steve set me straight, it should be:
The meteorite episode is a half hour long total (minus
commercials = 22 minutes of tape), and the Glorietta
splits that with Brenham, so we should expect around
11 minutes each, more or less.
On the 19th, I
I have been corrected by martin horejsi about the number on the la lande
piece.The number on the slice is a nininger number,not a monnig one.I
apoligize for my error.Thanks again martin.
steve
Steve, Steve, Steve...
I did not correct you. You are absolutely right that there is a Monnig
number on your La Lande slice.
I was merely pointing out that there is ALSO a Nininger Collection
number painted on it under the Monnig number.
That fact alone should help sell your piece!
Best
Hi again, Sonny,
I have to correct myself -- a search of the Met database turns up your
name in association with the Palo Verde Mine (AZ) meteorite:
1998g stone found by Homer Stockam, 03/11/2004; classified by M.
Hutson,
ASU; main mass, L. Sloan; type specimen, Cascadia Meteorite Laboratory.
Correction, Great Job Larry!
Time for bed I guess.
Larry Atkins
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
In my last post at
http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/meteorite-list/2005-November/178653.html ,
my thinking and argument drifted from TL dating to OSL dating.
My paragraph concerning the TL dating should have read:
One significant problem here is that thermoluminescent dating
presumes a steady
2nd attempt...
- - - -
Hi All,
After visiting several more websites, I've concluded that my horned
lizard is actually not P. mcallii, but rather P. platyrhinos (Desert
Horned Lizard), which is not protected or endangered. I was thrown
off by the skull diagrams on this page:
My earlier post SHOULD have listed my phone number as
(619) 286-4837 - just too excited, I guess.
Michael
on 1/29/05 4:12 PM, Michael L Blood at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings all,
As most of you know, I am an old SNC fanatic. While I did
not anticipate it, the main mass of
In my previous post, I stated that I was looking for:
Uranolithe fosslie Astronomie. vol. 7, p. 58
(1887).
The correct year is 1888 and page should be 114. the
correct citation is;
Uranolithe fosslie Astronomie. vol. 7, p. 114
(1888).
the article gives L'Astronomie as an alternative
spelling.
I meant SAU 119, not 001
Cj
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
http://www.meteoriteguy.com/NWA2081.htm
sorry, here is the working link.
Mike
I want to correct something in an email I sent.I meant it is a travisty
against the lord to any that says or does anything against them.To those
people who serve god and are willing to do it threw self dedicated
sacrifice no one has the right to say or do anything that should put these
great
oops, I forgot the two little words the range
Herein, we r e c o m m e n d designation of the CB (C, carbonaceous;
B, bencubbinite) chondrites, a new grouplet that greatly extends t h e
r a n g e of nebular/metal silicate and volatile element fractionations
recorded in chondrites. These
Hi list.I noticed that I had a typing error in my ebay about me page.It
was corrected.I'm sorry for the mistake.
steve
=
Steve R.Arnold, Chicago, IL, 60120
I. M. C. A. MEMBER #6728
Illinois Meteorites
website url
1) eccore is encore, of course :-)
2) My statistical overview is purely numerical - it does not
consider tentative or authenticated pairings which would,
of course, decrease the total of carbonaceous chondrites!
3) 669 2002Bernd Pauli databases (October 2002)
Regards,
Bernd
Hi All,
Just a quick correction to a misleading statement made in that
MSNBC story about 2002 NY40 that Ron posted to the list:
In a rare event slated for mid-August, an asteroid will pass
close enough to Earth to be visible through binoculars and small
telescopes.
I was going to let this
Although the newest members of the Martian meteorite family
are mostly from Antarctica, there is also one Saharan meteorite.
One Saharan Martian ??? There are 16 minus 7 paired ones = 9 (!)
This may have been a miscommunication because
I overlooked the words newest members.
Sorry :-(
Bernd
81 matches
Mail list logo
