Re: [meteorite-list] Excessively Large Reward a bad precedent.

2009-03-29 Thread ensoramanda
Hi Al, All. That was exacty my thought Al. We have had lots of talk about hunters needing to charge high prices for West to get a return. I understand that travel, research and all the other costs and time involved have to be taken into account when working our price, but actually $10 000 for

Re: [meteorite-list] Excessively Large Reward a bad precedent.

2009-03-29 Thread Dave Gheesling
To: 'Meteorite List'; almitt Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Excessively Large Reward a bad precedent. Hi Al, All. That was exacty my thought Al. We have had lots of talk about hunters needing to charge high prices for West to get a return. I understand that travel, research and all the other costs and time

Re: [meteorite-list] Excessively Large Reward a bad precedent.

2009-03-28 Thread Rob Matson
Capt. Renault in the casino scene in Casablanca: I'm shocked -- SHOCKED -- to find that gambling in going on here! (as the croupier hands him a stack of money) http://www.news8austin.com/content/top_stories/?ArID=232225 :-) Rob __

Re: [meteorite-list] Excessively Large Reward a bad precedent

2009-03-28 Thread GeoZay
This practice dates back around 20 years . It was started by our fearless leader Bob Haag. I remember a TV show called Missing : Reward, where Bob offered up to a one million dollar reward for a piece of the Tucson Iron along with it's exact find location. True story he admits this on

[meteorite-list] Excessively Large Reward a bad precedent.

2009-03-27 Thread McCartney Taylor
A $5,000/kg or $10,000/kg reward for the first kg may be appropriate for most some falls. But quickly the newspapers will drop the 'first kg' part and spread the value at $10/g. There will also be unit errs and report the value at $10,000/lb. $20,000/kg is ludicrous. I think we, as a

Re: [meteorite-list] Excessively Large Reward a bad precedent.

2009-03-27 Thread Meteorites USA
My opinion is that it should not be publicized except through private channels, email, fax, and maybe local fliers. Or if you publish something in the paper or on local TV channels simply use the word REWARD! with no $ amount attached to it. It's all about marketing image and I understand that

Re: [meteorite-list] Excessively Large Reward a bad precedent.

2009-03-27 Thread Notkin
Dear Mac: You and I must have some kind of a psychic link : ) I was planning a post on this very topic, but you beat me to it. This may stir things up a bit, but that is not my intention. As someone who goes out in the field, and does part of the actual work of recovery, I feel I

Re: [meteorite-list] Excessively Large Reward a bad precedent.

2009-03-27 Thread Bill Mason
, 2009 12:48 PM To: Meteorite List Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Excessively Large Reward a bad precedent. Dear Mac: You and I must have some kind of a psychic link : ) I was planning a post on this very topic, but you beat me to it. This may stir things up a bit, but that is not my intention

Re: [meteorite-list] Excessively Large Reward a bad precedent.

2009-03-27 Thread GeoZay
I agree with McCartney that there needs to be some sort of gentleman's agreement, not for the reward amount but that there not be a dollar amount posted at all. REWARD FOR METEORITES! is a sufficient phrase for use in the lead generation and helps in the protection of hunters and market

Re: [meteorite-list] Excessively Large Reward a bad precedent.

2009-03-27 Thread Howard Steffic
...@blackbearddata.com To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:15:56 -0600 Subject: [meteorite-list] Excessively Large Reward a bad precedent. A $5,000/kg or $10,000/kg reward for the first kg may be appropriate for most some falls. But quickly the newspapers will drop the 'first kg

Re: [meteorite-list] Excessively Large Reward a bad precedent.

2009-03-27 Thread Rob Wesel
Inflated field prices Landowners refusing to allow their property hunt Risk to all hunters safety from mugging or perceived attempts to con the public Flooding the area with every kid on spring break who doesn't consider the care needed to maintain a good relationship with landowners.

Re: [meteorite-list] Excessively Large Reward a bad precedent.

2009-03-27 Thread cdtucson
This practice dates back around 20 years . It was started by our fearless leader Bob Haag. I remember a TV show called Missing : Reward, where Bob offered up to a one million dollar reward for a piece of the Tucson Iron along with it's exact find location. True story he admits this on page 14

Re: [meteorite-list] Excessively Large Reward a bad precedent.

2009-03-27 Thread Adam Hupe
I have been hearing for a couple of years now from insiders and outsiders alike that say it is beyond embarrassing how some dealers are more worried about their ego than they are about the product they sell. My other half asked? Don't these guys have a woman in their life to prevent them from

Re: [meteorite-list] Excessively Large Reward a bad precedent.

2009-03-27 Thread almitt
Greetings, The trouble with a gentleman's agreement is you need two gentlemen. Another problem with all this is, the next fall, when specimens are found, the first thing that the owners are going to do is go to the Internet and put in a search of meteorites and price. What they will find is

Re: [meteorite-list] Excessively Large Reward a bad precedent.

2009-03-27 Thread John.L.Cabassi
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Excessively Large Reward a bad precedent. Greetings, The trouble with a gentleman's agreement is you need two gentlemen. Another problem with all this is, the next fall, when specimens are found, the first thing that the owners are going to do is go to the Internet