Re: [meteorite-list] Integrity of meteorites
Dear List, The meteorite and details look suspect? https://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/metbull.php?sea=Pakepake+005=names=contains=50=ge==All=name=All=All0=Normal%20table=81448 Dirk Ross On Wednesday, February 21, 2024 at 07:41:55 AM GMT+9, Anne Black via Meteorite-list wrote: Yes John, But if it turns out to be true that this lunar never was in the Taklamakan desert, it should be made public, just like Shirokovsky and others. So the records and the Met.Bulletin can be corrected. Anne Black IMPACTIKA.com impact...@aol.com On Tuesday, February 20, 2024 at 03:01:48 AM MST, John Lutzon via Meteorite-list wrote: Hello, my best.. Meteorite-list is a avenue for people to discuss meteorite related topics--right? Recently, (2/20/24), a Lunar (frag, breccia), Pakepake 005, from China was picture posted online. The comments regarding the circumstances of this find appeared to question its find location and the finders integrity without foundation. I fully agree with the comment to OUT the scammers. But, before computer keyboard destroying a finder/seller's reputation --- say How/Why. As said, product misrepresentation in any business is old hat. Caveat Emptor. Should someone have information regarding this finder, I would be interested, (Privately). Regards, John Lutzon __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Re: [meteorite-list] Integrity of meteorites
Anne, Of course! 100%! But, again, before such analyses are completed to prove such, it's premature to assume foul play. Click "Recent Comments" on MPOD. John > On 02/20/2024 3:08 PM EST Anne Black wrote: > > > Yes John, > > But if it turns out to be true that this lunar never was in the Taklamakan > desert, it should be made public, just like Shirokovsky and others. So the > records and the Met.Bulletin can be corrected. > > Anne Black > IMPACTIKA.com > impact...@aol.com > > > On Tuesday, February 20, 2024 at 03:01:48 AM MST, John Lutzon via > Meteorite-list wrote: > > > > Hello, my best.. > > Meteorite-list is a avenue for people to discuss meteorite related > topics--right? > Recently, (2/20/24), a Lunar (frag, breccia), Pakepake 005, from China was > picture posted online. The comments regarding the circumstances of this find > appeared to question its find location and the finders integrity without > foundation. > > I fully agree with the comment to OUT the scammers. But, before computer > keyboard destroying a finder/seller's reputation --- say How/Why. > > As said, product misrepresentation in any business is old hat. Caveat Emptor. > Should someone have information regarding this finder, I would be interested, > (Privately). > > Regards, John Lutzon > __ > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Re: [meteorite-list] Integrity of meteorites
Yes John, But if it turns out to be true that this lunar never was in the Taklamakan desert, it should be made public, just like Shirokovsky and others. So the records and the Met.Bulletin can be corrected. Anne blackimpactika.comimpact...@aol.com On Tuesday, February 20, 2024 at 03:01:48 AM MST, John Lutzon via Meteorite-list wrote: Hello, my best.. Meteorite-list is a avenue for people to discuss meteorite related topics--right? Recently, (2/20/24), a Lunar (frag, breccia), Pakepake 005, from China was picture posted online. The comments regarding the circumstances of this find appeared to question its find location and the finders integrity without foundation. I fully agree with the comment to OUT the scammers. But, before computer keyboard destroying a finder/seller's reputation --- say How/Why. As said, product misrepresentation in any business is old hat. Caveat Emptor. Should someone have information regarding this finder, I would be interested, (Privately). Regards, John Lutzon __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
[meteorite-list] Integrity of meteorites
Hello, my best.. Meteorite-list is a avenue for people to discuss meteorite related topics--right? Recently, (2/20/24), a Lunar (frag, breccia), Pakepake 005, from China was picture posted online. The comments regarding the circumstances of this find appeared to question its find location and the finders integrity without foundation. I fully agree with the comment to OUT the scammers. But, before computer keyboard destroying a finder/seller's reputation --- say How/Why. As said, product misrepresentation in any business is old hat. Caveat Emptor. Should someone have information regarding this finder, I would be interested, (Privately). Regards, John Lutzon __ Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
