Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 36, Issue 28

2006-12-08 Thread E.P. Grondine
 for a long-period comet crossing the
 Earth's orbit is 2.2 to 2.5 
 x 10-9 per perihelion passage. The mean impact
 velocity is approximately 52 
 km sec-1 but the most probable impact energy is
 characterized by a velocity 
 of 56 to 58 km/sec. The estimated current impact
 rate for cometary nuclei 
 large enough to create 10 km diameter (or larger)
 craters on the Earth is 
 between 5 x 10-7 and 2.8 x 10-6 per year, with a bed
 estimated value of 1.0 
 x 10-6 per year. Nuclei large enough to initiate
 global climatic 
 disturbances strike the Earth on average every 16
 Myr. The impact frequency 
 may be increased substantially for brief periods of
 time during cometary 
 showers, initiated by major perturbations of the
 Oort cloud. Improved 
 technologies are needed to detect approaching
 long-period comets at large 
 heliocentric distances so as to increase the warning
 time for potential 
 impactors. 


 - Original Message - 
 From: Chris Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 12:02 AM
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest,
 Vol 36, Issue 28
 
 
  Comet Tempel-Tuttle, the parent body of the
 Leonids, is in a
  low-inclination, retrograde orbit. We encounter
 the debris at 71 km/s,
  and our own orbital speed is 29.6 km/s. Subtract
 that out and you get
  the orbital speed for Leonid meteoroids: ~41.4
 km/s. The solar escape
  velocity at the Earth is 42.1 km/s. That's why the
 Leonids are as fast
  as any periodic meteors can be- faster meteoroids
 would leave the Solar
  System. Of course, a sporadic meteor could be
 produced by a body that
  would escape the Solar System if it didn't
 encounter the Earth- either
  because it originated outside the Solar System, or
 because it picked up
  enough energy through momentum transfer during
 some sort of slingshot
  around another body. I don't know if anybody has
 worked out the
  likelihood of that happening- very, very rare I'm
 sure.
 
  Chris
 
  *
  Chris L Peterson
  Cloudbait Observatory
  http://www.cloudbait.com
 
 
 
 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com

http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 



 

Any questions? Get answers on any topic at www.Answers.yahoo.com.  Try it now.
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 36, Issue 28

2006-12-08 Thread Chris Peterson
I was discussing the probability of encountering a meteor with a 
velocity greater than the Sun's escape velocity at the Earth. The 
likelihood of that happening should be much lower than the likelihood of 
simply encountering a stray object kicked out of the Oort Cloud. There 
are only a few ways an object can pick up additional energy by momentum 
transfer, and an infinite number of ways it can avoid doing so. And I 
wasn't particularly thinking of ruin-your-day sorts of events; even very 
rare high speed meteoroids should follow a power law size distribution, 
so a pebble should be much more common than a boulder (even if neither 
has happened more than a handful of times since the formation of the 
Solar System).

Chris

*
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com


- Original Message - 
From: Sterling K. Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Meteorite List meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Cc: Chris Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 12:59 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 36, Issue 28


 Hi, All,

 Chris said:
 I don't know if anybody has worked out the
 likelihood of that happening- very, very rare...

I called my oddsmaker in Vegas (or was it Vega),
 and here's what he said...

The problem is essentially the same as the likelihood
 of being smacked by a one-time long period comet; it
 falls in from the back of nowhere , slingshots around
 the Sun, and zaps back out.

It's completely random; it could come from any
 direction -- the Oort Cloud is a sphere. So, imagine
 that the radius of the orbit of the Earth defines an
 inner sphere surrounding the Sun, through which
 the object will have to pass in order to swing around
 the Sun and back out.

The surface area of that sphere is about two billion
 times the cross section of the Earth itself, so the odds
 of being hit by the incoming comet is one in two billion,
 and the odds of being hit by the outgoing comet is one in
 two billion.

Overall, the odds are about one in a billion for both
 coming and going. There is a good sized (10 kilometer
 diameter and up)* long period comet almost every year,
 so we will get comet-whacked every billion years or so.
[* Comet Hale-Bopp was 40 MILES in diameter.]

On average...

Little long period comets (1 kilometer to 10 kilometers
 diameter) are 5-10 times more common, so expect a medium
 comet whack every (couple of) 100,000,000 years or so.

Of course, being gob-smacked by a long period comet is
 just about the worst. I hate when that happens. The comet is
 going at the solar system escape velocity (almost); the Earth
 is going at its orbital velocity. What the vector total of those
 two?

Answer: Too much. The kinetic energy goes up by the
 square of the velocity, so maybe 4 to 6 times the energy of
 the impact of an asteroid of the same mass. That's going
 to leave a mark, as they say.

Just to prove that the Universe isn't a sporting
 proposition, a long period comet coming from the Oort
 Cloud isn't likely to brighten enough to be detected by
 visual comet finders until it's near the orbit of Jupiter,
 which would give us about 2-3 weeks of warning of
 an incoming encounter -- hardly enough time to get
 drunk, have a last fling, and say your prayers.

Of an outgoing encounter, we'd have 4-5 weeks of
 warning time. That's some improvement but not much.
 Not, for example, enough time to move several billion
 people to the side of the planet away from the impact
 point. Hmm. How many frequent flyer miles you got?
 You feel like a long vacation?

Of course, if the comet was just from Far Kuiper
 County, with a period of 3000-4000 years, we'd have
 months (instead of weeks) to get ready. You'll be ready
 in 4-5 months, won't you?

Since the Leonids are retrograde and the Earth prograde,
 the encounter velocity is the vector sum of the two, but the
 angle of incidence between the Earth and the Leonid stream
 varies from year to year; when it's 180 degrees, or face-on,
 the encounter velocity is the oft-quoted 71,000+ mps. At
 lesser angles, it's somewhat less but still hefty. Nice that
 they're mostly just pea gravel and sand sized bits; very pretty
 and they don't leave marks.



 Sterling K. Webb

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 36, Issue 28

2006-12-08 Thread E.P. Grondine
Hi all - 

--- Chris Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 even very rare high speed meteoroids should follow a

 power law size distribution, so a pebble should be 
 much more common than a boulder 

I think that meteorids as currently defined includes
both comet bits and asteroid bits.  If that is so,
then their size distribution would not follow a power
law, but rather would be the sum of two power law
distributions.

I couldn't understand what you were trying to say in
tne next part of this, but then it's still early in
the morning and I haven't even finished my coffee yet.

good hunting,
Ed





 

Need a quick answer? Get one in minutes from people who know.
Ask your question on www.Answers.yahoo.com
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 36, Issue 28

2006-12-08 Thread E.P. Grondine
Hi all  - 

Ahah - things are becoming clearer - 

Perhaps this explains to some degree the apparent lack
of cometary meteorites - their speeds are too high to
survive entry - of course, the other alternative is 
that the experts in meteoritics have simply
mis-identified cometary meteorites - my guess is that
some of the iron-silicites come from cometary
nucleus's (nuclei?), but then who knows?  

That's one of the things that makes meteoritics so
interesting - it's still a developing science, and a
fundamental one at that. I wonder if the term
cuttings will ever replace Bessey specks in
advertisements?

good hunting, 
Ed


--- Chris Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Comet Tempel-Tuttle, the parent body of the Leonids,
 is in a 
 low-inclination, retrograde orbit. We encounter the
 debris at 71 km/s, 
 and our own orbital speed is 29.6 km/s. Subtract
 that out and you get 
 the orbital speed for Leonid meteoroids: ~41.4 km/s.
 The solar escape 
 velocity at the Earth is 42.1 km/s. That's why the
 Leonids are as fast 
 as any periodic meteors can be- faster meteoroids
 would leave the Solar 
 System. Of course, a sporadic meteor could be
 produced by a body that 
 would escape the Solar System if it didn't encounter
 the Earth- either 
 because it originated outside the Solar System, or
 because it picked up 
 enough energy through momentum transfer during some
 sort of slingshot 
 around another body. I don't know if anybody has
 worked out the 
 likelihood of that happening- very, very rare I'm
 sure.
 
 Chris
 
 *
 Chris L Peterson
 Cloudbait Observatory
 http://www.cloudbait.com
 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Sterling K. Webb
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Chris Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
 meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 8:30 PM
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest,
 Vol 36, Issue 28
 
 
  Hi, Visual, Chris, List
 
 For the benefit of Listees following the
 question
  of how slow a meteoroid can be...
 
 The orbital velocity for any body is maximally
  the escape velocity divided by the square root of
 2,
  or 70.707070707...%. Can we just call that 71%?
  Escape velocity is 11,263.04 meters per second.
 So, the
  highest orbital velocity is 7964.17 meters per
 second.
 
 That's the orbital velocity at the lowest
 possible
  orbit, skimming over the surface. The orbital
 velocity
  gets less and less the higher the orbit, so that
 geo-
  synchronous orbital velocity is positively pokey,
  around 3000 meters per second. You have to go
 faster than that just to 
  get there, then slow down
  to stay there. Crazy stuff, that gravity.
 
 The only orbit that can decay is one close
 enough to the top of 
  the atmosphere to be slowed
  into re-entry. But (big but), the only way an
 object
  from somewhere not of this earth can get to the
  top of our atmosphere is to fall there, in the
 course
  of which fall, it will acquire additional
 velocity, up
  to escape velocity.
 
 Escape velocity is like taxes, in that there
 just doesn't seem to 
  be any way to wiggle out.
 By the time an object gets to the top of the
 atmosphere, it will 
  have acquired all of escape velocity except that
 which it would (try 
  to) pick up in the last 50 miles.
 
 By even the Earth's escape velocity of 22,263
 mps is quite slow 
  compared to the approach of most meteoroids.
 Leonids are among the 
  fastest (70,000 mps) in approach velocity (theirs
 and ours). Most 
  objects from the asteroid zone are going to
 intercept Earth at twice 
  our escape velocity or more.
 
 The slow fireball is a rarity, but the one
 most
  likely to get something to the ground. The
 statistics
  of meteorites (on the ground) are misleading:
 irons are much rarer 
  than their proportion on our collections. It's
 just that they can 
  withstand re-entry so much better than rocks and
 that they can persist 
  longer in an Earth environment than mere rocks do.
 In re-entry,
  irons are better than rocks; slow rocks are better
 than fast ones; big 
  rocks are better than little ones.
  A meteorite in the hand is better than 1000 in
 freefall.
 
 
  Sterling K. Webb
 
 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com

http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 



 

Any questions? Get answers on any topic at www.Answers.yahoo.com.  Try it now.
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 36, Issue 28

2006-12-08 Thread Sterling K. Webb
Hi,

Ed said:
 Think of it as the ultimate test of human
 intelligence. Will we pass? I don't know.

In 1752, another author, Voltaire, wrote a story
about a giant alien tourist from Sirius, Micromegas, 
and his companion from Saturn, who tour the solar 
system and visit the Earth. The Saturnian believes
that the Earth cannot be inhabited:

In truth, what chiefly makes me think there is no
inhabitant of this sphere, is that I cannot suppose any 
sensible being would wish to live here. 

Well, said Micromegas, perhaps the beings 
who inhabit it do not possess good sense.


Sterling K. Webb
--
Text of Micromegas:
http://wondersmith.com/scifi/micro.htm
--
- Original Message - 
From: E.P. Grondine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 8:29 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 36, Issue 28


 Hi all - 
 
 I just wrote a book on man and impact. It's called
 Man and Impact in the Americas, and it's available
 through amazon. I'm tired now, so I'll keep this
 short.
 
 The experts numbers for impact appear to be off by
 about factor of ten, in the impactors' favor, not
 man's.  Over the last 6,000,000 years, we've come
 close to extinction several times.
 
 Impact rate estimates have been crippled for about 30
 years, largely due to confusion spread by Dr. David
 Morrison over the role of comets in impact. While
 Morrison did pioneer ground breaking work with
 Shoemaker some years back, since then his use of the
 power he gained from that work has been to the
 detriment of the field, and the detriment of us all.
 
 We can deal with this now, with the technologies we
 have in hand, but only if we make a concerted effort.
 
 Think of it as the ultimate test of human
 intelligence.
 Will we pass? I don't know.
 
 I'm going to get some more coffee and cigarettes.
 
 good hunting,
 Ed
 


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 36, Issue 28

2006-12-07 Thread VisualThinker7
 
In a message dated 12/7/2006 12:02:46 PM Eastern Standard Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Reentering space junk is slow, and is usually reported as  
green.

Chris



I'm guessing that 'space junk' is slower because it was in orbit, and as  the 
orbit decayed it entered the atmosphere as a shallow angle. Then, as the  
atmosphere grew thicker, it slowed gradually. 
 
All of the green fireballs I've seen during my years of hiking and camping  
out west were close to the ground. The much smaller and more numerous ones  
further away always appeared white. 
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 36, Issue 28

2006-12-07 Thread Chris Peterson
Objects in orbit around the Earth reenter close to Earth's escape 
velocity, which sets the lower limit for anything entering our 
atmosphere (the upper limit is set by the escape velocity of the Sun at 
the Earth- it's unlikely that anything we encounter would be faster than 
that). And for the most part, as you note, reentering objects are 
usually in flat trajectories, so they burn much longer, and are likely 
to slow down enough to stop burning before vaporizing. The Air Force has 
a group whose mission is to recover fallen junk.

I'm not sure what you mean by close to the ground- anything you saw 
was probably more than 20 miles high, with 50 being more likely. There's 
no way to tell by eye how high a fireball actually is.

Chris

*
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com


- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 12:17 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 36, Issue 28


 I'm guessing that 'space junk' is slower because it was in orbit, and 
 as  the
 orbit decayed it entered the atmosphere as a shallow angle. Then, as 
 the
 atmosphere grew thicker, it slowed gradually.

 All of the green fireballs I've seen during my years of hiking and 
 camping
 out west were close to the ground. The much smaller and more numerous 
 ones
 further away always appeared white.

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 36, Issue 28

2006-12-07 Thread Sterling K. Webb
Hi, Visual, Chris, List

For the benefit of Listees following the question
of how slow a meteoroid can be...

The orbital velocity for any body is maximally
the escape velocity divided by the square root of 2,
or 70.707070707...%. Can we just call that 71%?
Escape velocity is 11,263.04 meters per second. So, the
highest orbital velocity is 7964.17 meters per second.

That's the orbital velocity at the lowest possible
orbit, skimming over the surface. The orbital velocity
gets less and less the higher the orbit, so that geo-
synchronous orbital velocity is positively pokey,
around 3000 meters per second. You have to go 
faster than that just to get there, then slow down
to stay there. Crazy stuff, that gravity.

The only orbit that can decay is one close 
enough to the top of the atmosphere to be slowed
into re-entry. But (big but), the only way an object
from somewhere not of this earth can get to the
top of our atmosphere is to fall there, in the course
of which fall, it will acquire additional velocity, up
to escape velocity.

Escape velocity is like taxes, in that there just 
doesn't seem to be any way to wiggle out. 

By the time an object gets to the top of the 
atmosphere, it will have acquired all of escape 
velocity except that which it would (try to) pick 
up in the last 50 miles.

By even the Earth's escape velocity of 22,263 mps 
is quite slow compared to the approach of most 
meteoroids. Leonids are among the fastest (70,000 
mps) in approach velocity (theirs and ours). Most 
objects from the asteroid zone are going to intercept 
Earth at twice our escape velocity or more.

The slow fireball is a rarity, but the one most
likely to get something to the ground. The statistics
of meteorites (on the ground) are misleading: irons 
are much rarer than their proportion on our collections. 
It's just that they can withstand re-entry so much 
better than rocks and that they can persist longer in 
an Earth environment than mere rocks do. In re-entry,
irons are better than rocks; slow rocks are better 
than fast ones; big rocks are better than little ones.
A meteorite in the hand is better than 1000 in freefall.


Sterling K. Webb

- Original Message - 
From: Chris Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 5:48 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 36, Issue 28


 Objects in orbit around the Earth reenter close to Earth's escape 
 velocity, which sets the lower limit for anything entering our 
 atmosphere (the upper limit is set by the escape velocity of the Sun at 
 the Earth- it's unlikely that anything we encounter would be faster than 
 that). And for the most part, as you note, reentering objects are 
 usually in flat trajectories, so they burn much longer, and are likely 
 to slow down enough to stop burning before vaporizing. The Air Force has 
 a group whose mission is to recover fallen junk.
 
 I'm not sure what you mean by close to the ground- anything you saw 
 was probably more than 20 miles high, with 50 being more likely. There's 
 no way to tell by eye how high a fireball actually is.
 
 Chris
 
 *
 Chris L Peterson
 Cloudbait Observatory
 http://www.cloudbait.com
 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 12:17 PM
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 36, Issue 28
 
 
 I'm guessing that 'space junk' is slower because it was in orbit, and 
 as  the
 orbit decayed it entered the atmosphere as a shallow angle. Then, as 
 the
 atmosphere grew thicker, it slowed gradually.

 All of the green fireballs I've seen during my years of hiking and 
 camping
 out west were close to the ground. The much smaller and more numerous 
 ones
 further away always appeared white.
 
 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 36, Issue 28

2006-12-07 Thread Chris Peterson
Comet Tempel-Tuttle, the parent body of the Leonids, is in a 
low-inclination, retrograde orbit. We encounter the debris at 71 km/s, 
and our own orbital speed is 29.6 km/s. Subtract that out and you get 
the orbital speed for Leonid meteoroids: ~41.4 km/s. The solar escape 
velocity at the Earth is 42.1 km/s. That's why the Leonids are as fast 
as any periodic meteors can be- faster meteoroids would leave the Solar 
System. Of course, a sporadic meteor could be produced by a body that 
would escape the Solar System if it didn't encounter the Earth- either 
because it originated outside the Solar System, or because it picked up 
enough energy through momentum transfer during some sort of slingshot 
around another body. I don't know if anybody has worked out the 
likelihood of that happening- very, very rare I'm sure.

Chris

*
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com


- Original Message - 
From: Sterling K. Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Chris Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 8:30 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 36, Issue 28


 Hi, Visual, Chris, List

For the benefit of Listees following the question
 of how slow a meteoroid can be...

The orbital velocity for any body is maximally
 the escape velocity divided by the square root of 2,
 or 70.707070707...%. Can we just call that 71%?
 Escape velocity is 11,263.04 meters per second. So, the
 highest orbital velocity is 7964.17 meters per second.

That's the orbital velocity at the lowest possible
 orbit, skimming over the surface. The orbital velocity
 gets less and less the higher the orbit, so that geo-
 synchronous orbital velocity is positively pokey,
 around 3000 meters per second. You have to go faster than that just to 
 get there, then slow down
 to stay there. Crazy stuff, that gravity.

The only orbit that can decay is one close enough to the top of 
 the atmosphere to be slowed
 into re-entry. But (big but), the only way an object
 from somewhere not of this earth can get to the
 top of our atmosphere is to fall there, in the course
 of which fall, it will acquire additional velocity, up
 to escape velocity.

Escape velocity is like taxes, in that there just doesn't seem to 
 be any way to wiggle out.
By the time an object gets to the top of the atmosphere, it will 
 have acquired all of escape velocity except that which it would (try 
 to) pick up in the last 50 miles.

By even the Earth's escape velocity of 22,263 mps is quite slow 
 compared to the approach of most meteoroids. Leonids are among the 
 fastest (70,000 mps) in approach velocity (theirs and ours). Most 
 objects from the asteroid zone are going to intercept Earth at twice 
 our escape velocity or more.

The slow fireball is a rarity, but the one most
 likely to get something to the ground. The statistics
 of meteorites (on the ground) are misleading: irons are much rarer 
 than their proportion on our collections. It's just that they can 
 withstand re-entry so much better than rocks and that they can persist 
 longer in an Earth environment than mere rocks do. In re-entry,
 irons are better than rocks; slow rocks are better than fast ones; big 
 rocks are better than little ones.
 A meteorite in the hand is better than 1000 in freefall.


 Sterling K. Webb

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 36, Issue 28

2006-12-07 Thread Sterling K. Webb
] Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 36, Issue 28


 Comet Tempel-Tuttle, the parent body of the Leonids, is in a
 low-inclination, retrograde orbit. We encounter the debris at 71 km/s,
 and our own orbital speed is 29.6 km/s. Subtract that out and you get
 the orbital speed for Leonid meteoroids: ~41.4 km/s. The solar escape
 velocity at the Earth is 42.1 km/s. That's why the Leonids are as fast
 as any periodic meteors can be- faster meteoroids would leave the Solar
 System. Of course, a sporadic meteor could be produced by a body that
 would escape the Solar System if it didn't encounter the Earth- either
 because it originated outside the Solar System, or because it picked up
 enough energy through momentum transfer during some sort of slingshot
 around another body. I don't know if anybody has worked out the
 likelihood of that happening- very, very rare I'm sure.

 Chris

 *
 Chris L Peterson
 Cloudbait Observatory
 http://www.cloudbait.com



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list