someone meteoritically
qualified says different! ;-)
- Original Message -
From: Darren Garrison
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 3:52 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] The New Jersey Object
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 23:27:34 + (GMT
Mike,
I observed the same thing and was struck by the way this chunk of metal looks
more like
it passed through some kind of grinder or other machinery. That kind of damage
just
doesn't seem consistent with falling iron. It looks more like slag that got
caught up in
some machinery than a
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 23:45:58 +1100, you wrote:
Hey Darren,
The pics are larger but just shrunk to fit on the page. You can either save
the image and view it normally on your computer as you might any other pic
or even drag the image to the URL address bar which will enlarge it.
Okay, that's
On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 10:10:51 -0500, you wrote:
Here's another observation pertaining to the unusual surface marks of this
unidentified fallen? object.
I'm seeing sets of parallel lines that appear to have been gouged into this
thing. They are inset horizontally and vertically, Perpendicular to
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Kuyken [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 6:45 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] The New Jersey Object
Hey Darren,
The pics are larger but just shrunk to fit on the page
]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] The New Jersey Object
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 10:58:44 -0500
On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 10:10:51 -0500, you wrote:
Here's another observation pertaining to the unusual surface marks of this
unidentified fallen
On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 18:08:51 -0500, you wrote:
It would be cool if it were genuine, but personally, I see much to be
skeptical about.
I agree, seeing bigger pictures makes it look odder and odder. But the question
is, if it is something thrown by some sort of explosion, shouldn't there be
i'm informed the object will undergo appropriate analysis.
as previously expressed, i highly doubt this is a new meteorite---and
i wholly agree
with the tabling this topic for a month or so or until such time
there is news.
as it regards the media's turn with this event, consider the
K. Webb
- Original Message -
From: Darren Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 5:13 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] The New Jersey Object
On Thu, 01 Feb
Hello Darren, All,
By right-clicking the photos, clicking properties, and going directly to the
picture URL, I was able to get these:
http://www.njfossils.net/meteorite/DVC01306.JPG
http://www.njfossils.net/meteorite/DVC01291.JPG
http://www.njfossils.net/meteorite/DVC01288.JPG
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 23:27:34 + (GMT), you wrote:
For anybody intersted in seeing the pictures that I took of the NJO, I created
a short webpage of the images.
They are raw from the camera, so they might take a little time to load.
Thanks, Derek.
www.njfossils.net/newjerseyobject.html
11 matches
Mail list logo
