Dammit. This just totally unnerves me:
http://www.google.com/googlecalendar/event_publisher_guide.html
Look at how you craft the URL to instantiate an event in Google
Calendar. No standard class items, no standard properties, no
reference to existing best practices/standards.
If it wasn't
On Apr 12, 2006, at 11:27 PM, Sam Sethi wrote:
So who's the new Google ;-)
depends who you ask:
http://www.google.com/searchq=%22is+the+new+google%22
says yahoo
http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=%22is+the+new+google%22
says 37 signals or maybe wikipedia
Or maybe it's not even a case of malice but of ignorance or laziness
in determining if there were previous efforts in the calendaring
problem space. We must remember that Google is the same company who
implements their Talk in the jabber open protocol.
Maybe the Google Calendar guys are not as
On 4/13/06, Antonio Touriño [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe the Google Calendar guys are not as thourough in their due
dilligence or maybe they considered hCal but discarded it for some
reason. Maybe it would be a good idea to bring them into our
discussion to have them shed us some light on
On Apr 13, 2006, at 8:37 AM, Mark Pilgrim wrote:
Anyway,
I'd bet microformats were not a top priority for their initial release
of Gcal, but that doesn't mean they can't add it later.
Can't we add it ourselves? I'm assuming the events are being
submitted via an AJAX call and authenticated
On 4/13/06, Scott Reynen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 13, 2006, at 8:37 AM, Mark Pilgrim wrote:
I'd bet microformats were not a top priority for their initial release
of Gcal, but that doesn't mean they can't add it later.
Can't we add it ourselves? I'm assuming the events are being
At least the folks under the Yahoo umbrella get it:
http://upcoming.org/news/archives/2006/04/12/invite_f/
Sweet!
Chris
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
Thanks to everyone for their thoughts, input, and contributions to
the http://microformats.org/wiki/work-of-art project.
Given the recommendations on the wiki and this list, it seems to me
that it would be best to design work of art as a distinct group of
optional additions to use with the
