Re: [uf-discuss] microformats search and pinging

2006-06-01 Thread Kevin Marks
On May 31, 2006, at 10:14 PM, Scott Reynen wrote: On May 31, 2006, at 9:29 PM, Tantek Çelik wrote: There are some indexers of specific microformats right now (e.g. Reevoo and Kritx both index hReviews), but no general microformats search engine. Hmm... I'm pretty sure I was indexing

Re: [uf-discuss] Re: eRDF/RDFa etc. - still off-topic for the same reasons

2006-06-01 Thread Evan Prodromou
On Wed, 2006-31-05 at 11:20 -0700, Tantek Çelik wrote: In short, even bothering discussing RDFA is NOT a productive use of time for microformats community. That's how broken it is (and the principles / assumptions behind it). Some reasons are outlined in my previous email. Tantek, I think

Re: [uf-discuss] microformats search and pinging

2006-06-01 Thread Evan Prodromou
On Wed, 2006-31-05 at 19:29 -0700, Tantek =?ISO-8859-1?B?xw==?=elik wrote: It is with particularly great pleasure that I encourage you try out the technology preview of Technorati microformats search, currently hosted on the Technorati Kitchen: http://kitchen.technorati.com/ That's

Re: [uf-discuss] microformats search and pinging

2006-06-01 Thread Tantek Çelik
Scott, You're right and I completely spaced about Microformat Base. http://tantek.com/log/2006/06.html#d01t1252 Mea Culpa. Tantek On 5/31/06 10:14 PM, Scott Reynen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On May 31, 2006, at 9:29 PM, Tantek Çelik wrote: There are some indexers of specific microformats

Re: [uf-discuss] CFP microformat?

2006-06-01 Thread Ryan King
On May 30, 2006, at 5:49 AM, Angus McIntyre wrote: At 21:45 +0200 20.05.2006, Ryan King wrote: On May 20, 2006, at 9:13 PM, Tantek Çelik wrote: A good first step might be to see if you can get these conferences just using hCalendar to start with ... I want to reemphasize this The use

Re: [uf-discuss] microformats search and pinging

2006-06-01 Thread Kevin Marks
On Jun 1, 2006, at 8:22 AM, Scott Reynen wrote: On Jun 1, 2006, at 1:00 AM, Kevin Marks wrote: On May 31, 2006, at 10:14 PM, Scott Reynen wrote: On May 31, 2006, at 9:29 PM, Tantek Çelik wrote: There are some indexers of specific microformats right now (e.g. Reevoo and Kritx both index

Re: [uf-discuss] RDFa and microformats

2006-06-01 Thread Ryan King
On May 30, 2006, at 7:54 PM, Joshua Kinberg wrote: That example of RDFa doesn't look like valid XHTML. Since when have XHTML elements included about, role, and property attributes? http://www.w3schools.com/tags/ref_standardattributes.asp Its XHTML 2, that's why. -ryan

Re: [uf-discuss] eRDF = microformats?

2006-06-01 Thread Ryan King
On May 31, 2006, at 10:09 AM, Dr. Ernie Prabhakar wrote: I apologize if this might be off-topic, but I'm honestly curious and would like to understand this better: http://www.bnode.org/archives2/58 eRDF: (+) follows the microformats principles

Re: [uf-discuss] eRDF = microformats?

2006-06-01 Thread Elias Torres
On 6/1/06, Ryan King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On May 31, 2006, at 10:09 AM, Dr. Ernie Prabhakar wrote: I apologize if this might be off-topic, but I'm honestly curious and would like to understand this better: http://www.bnode.org/archives2/58 eRDF: (+) follows the microformats principles

Re: [uf-discuss] eRDF = microformats?

2006-06-01 Thread Alex Iskold
I am fairly new to microformats. My initial reaction was why not describe the page data in XML first, then use XML to describe the presentation and then use XSLT to produce the actual HTML page. I then realized that this approach does not solve a problem. In fact it misses the point of