[uf-discuss] does hatom for comments make sense?

2006-09-12 Thread Stephanie Booth (bunny)
Given all this, does anybody have an idea why this wasn't implemented in things like Sandbox, and how to encourage the theme authors to do it in the next version? Steph -- http://climbtothestars.org/ ___ microformats-discuss mailing list

Re: [uf-discuss] does hatom for comments make sense?

2006-09-12 Thread David Janes
Right -- and a uF for expressing that relationship; this gets a little trickier. As uFs are about codifying existing practices, my (superficial) look at comment nesting shows that many sites (like slashdot) using nesting to express relationships, not explicit URI linking. On the other hand,

Re: [uf-discuss] LinkedIn will support microformats

2006-09-12 Thread David Janes
If I can then get GMail to dynamically read the hCards from LinkedIn, I'll be in Web 2.0 e-mail Nirvana. Regards, etc... David On 9/11/06, Chris Messina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Check it out... as part of their redesign, LinkedIn will be supporting hcard and hresume:

Re: [uf-discuss] LinkedIn will support microformats

2006-09-12 Thread Sebastian Küpers
This will make the decision for openBC easier I think ;) ___ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss

[uf-discuss] My Last Post Flock + Microformats

2006-09-12 Thread Farndon, Tony
Grr, forgot to remove my email signature from last post. Being a jobsworth but must point out that the email and its contents etc are in no way connected to my employees etc yadayadayada Sorry Tony Farndon Just another guy... + The Forestry Commission's computer systems may be monitored

Re: [uf-discuss] Flock + Microformats

2006-09-12 Thread Chris Messina
I have a meeting with the Flock folks today (yes, my former employer!) and I'll drop them a hint -- as I did when I worked there -- about their opportunity in being the first (and best!) in supporting microformats natively. Thanks for the tip! Chris On 9/12/06, Farndon, Tony [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [uf-discuss] Flock + Microformats

2006-09-12 Thread Farndon, Tony
Hi Chris Be sure NOT to show them the extension source code, they will scornfully frown at the immaturity of it :-). Mind you I knew absolutely nothing about xul and javascript before june of this year so you can't expect too much! Gives an idea of how easily it could fit into the blog editor

Re: RE: [uf-discuss] Flock + Microformats

2006-09-12 Thread Chris Messina
Here's teh workflow for you non-Flockers: http://www.flickr.com/photos/factoryjoe/sets/72157594281137456/ Nice work Tony! I'll definitely show the Flock folks the visuals! ;) What license is your extension? Chris On 9/12/06, Farndon, Tony [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Chris Be sure NOT to

RE: RE: [uf-discuss] Flock + Microformats

2006-09-12 Thread Farndon, Tony
damn forgot, will release under the GPL (and if you want to throw a 17 mac book pro my way as a thank you please do so..) Double damn, just realised I referred to flock as your employees not ers in my original post! Good luck, it really isn't too much work for them to incorporate

[uf-discuss] Re: Flock + Microformats

2006-09-12 Thread Chris Messina
Where it really gets interesting is in adding mF detection to Lucene. I'm pushing them to store people and relationships in hcard and xfn, but so far they've rolled their own RDF. Grr! Chris On 9/12/06, Farndon, Tony [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: damn forgot, will release under the GPL (and

Re: [uf-discuss] does hatom for comments make sense?

2006-09-12 Thread Stephen Paul Weber
I think that if using hAtom for comments is going to become 'standard' that we definately need to use class=comments (or something similar) to identify the nested comments feeds inside the main hfeed. Also, comments don't really have a 'title'... you could use the original post title (rarely

Re: [uf-discuss] does hatom for comments make sense?

2006-09-12 Thread Stephanie Booth (bunny)
would the feeds be nested? I think that in the example I saw, there were two feeds. One with only the blog post, and a separate one with the comments. Is it permitted by hAtom to nest feeds? I thought it wasn't. Steph On 9/12/06, Stephen Paul Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think that if

Re: [uf-discuss] does hatom for comments make sense?

2006-09-12 Thread Stephen Paul Weber
Comments are (almost) always right after a post... so yes, the comment feeds would have to be nested, unless the existed only on item pages. Having all the data avaliable at once has proved very useful in my previous applications of related technology (XOXO-based encoding as seen on

Re: [uf-discuss] does hatom for comments make sense?

2006-09-12 Thread David Janes
Comments are nested within entries and hfeed elements can be nested too. Typically, one doesn't see multiple entries with comments on the same page. In usage that I've seen, one would probably use this nesting structure: * hfeed (for the blog, optional) ** hentry (for the one entry on the page)

Re: [uf-discuss] does hatom for comments make sense?

2006-09-12 Thread Stephanie Booth (bunny)
On 9/12/06, David Janes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Comments are nested within entries and hfeed elements can be nested too. Typically, one doesn't see multiple entries with comments on the same page. it can be found in the wild, though. A very famous french-language blog, for example:

Re: [uf-discuss] hAtom implementation questions

2006-09-12 Thread Kevin Marks
I'd say both points are arguable. From my point of view, tags should be inside the post content, as otherwise they may be dropped from the feed. Likewise, Stephanie's other-language summaries are currently not in her Atom feed, which makes it less useful, as I find the English summaries handy