On 31/01/07, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Frances
Berriman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
As for an activity (if this is what you may be suggesting by
presense), the same would apply (is currently a
href=http://www.wikipedia.com/skydiving; rel=tagsky diving/a
On Feb 1, 2007, at 12:53 PM, Joe Andrieu wrote:
And to say that the community had a say in Tantek's
action is about as valid as saying the American public had a say in
George Bush's recent troop increase.
You are treading dangerously close to invoking Godwin's Law[1] here,
and a number of
On 2/2/07, Colin Barrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 1, 2007, at 12:53 PM, Joe Andrieu wrote:
And to say that the community had a say in Tantek's
action is about as valid as saying the American public had a say in
George Bush's recent troop increase.
You are treading dangerously close
On Feb 1, 2007, at 7:31 AM, Charles Roper wrote:
What does the community feel should be the focus for species at
present? Now that I know that the analysis of existing practice is
about the existing *content* rather than existing *markup*,
That's not entirely true. Existing markup plays a
I needed a profile URI for hCalendar for use with GRDDL, but there
wasn't even a profile. There was a list of terms [1] on the
microformats wiki, so using DanC's hCard profile [2] as a template
I've made a first draft [3].
I've no idea how complete or accurate the list of terms is, though
On 27/01/07, Derrick Lyndon Pallas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For anyone that hasn't met me: I'm a software engineer at a search
company. (However, nothing I say on this list is on behalf of or
reflects the views of my company.) For anyone that has met me: yes, I
finally signed up. (I'll no longer
On 02/02/07, Colin Barrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 1, 2007, at 7:31 AM, Charles Roper wrote:
What does the community feel should be the focus for species at
present? Now that I know that the analysis of existing practice is
about the existing *content* rather than existing *markup*,
Andy, Ben,
Agreed that Presence interop issue can lead to endless metaphysical discussions
and is out of scope here.
As both of you pointed out, the proposal is simply for better formalizing
self-expression in HTML content, in particular regarding moods and activities.
This is already useful
On 2/1/07, Michael McCracken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So if the evidence confirms my suspicion that it's really rare to need
to mark up the language of (for example) the book separately from the
language of the words in the book's title, then can we just say that
the language is inferred from
On 2/2/07, Derrick Lyndon Pallas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Except it does need it. Say you put your del.icio.us (or otherwise) feed
on your page and want to include it and the associated tags as xFolk
entries. How can a generic rel-tag parser know that the xFolk entires
don't apply to the current
On 2/2/07, Derrick Lyndon Pallas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Take the example of a dead relative: there is no way to put a family
tree with relatives you need to tag as deceased on your own page
without a document level parser concluding that you are dead.
--- that is not true, you are not
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael
McCracken [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
http://www.westmidlandbirdclub.com/biblio/bb/70-465.htm
Nice, those are good examples
Thank you.
- they do mark up the language of the
citation itself, but don't mention the language of the cited object
Brian Suda wrote:
Does that make sense?
That's what I get for using someone else's example.
Still, no one has responded to the more fundamental concern that rel-tag
is not reusable for things like lists of bookmarks. (Or does someone
really find it helpful that a page has content about X can
Ciaran McNulty wrote:
The tag applying to the page just means that there's something on the
page relevant to that tag. And there is - the del.icio.us feed!
The tag applies to the link; not the content, and certainly not the
whole contents of the page. If I search for pages with tag foo and a
Colin Barrett wrote:
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 4:05 AM
To: Microformats Discuss
Subject: Re: Moderation [was RE: [uf-discuss] Andy Mabbet's
moderation]
On Feb 1, 2007, at 12:53 PM, Joe Andrieu wrote:
And to say that the community had a say in Tantek's
action is about as valid
On 2/2/07, Derrick Lyndon Pallas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Still, no one has responded to the more fundamental concern that rel-tag
is not reusable for things like lists of bookmarks.
--- i think the issue might be with what you WANT rel-tag to be and
what it is? at the moment rel-tag would say
Hi Joe,
On Feb 2, 2007, at 8:22 AM, Joe Andrieu wrote:
Third, although few people like a gadfly, it appears that my
efforts are
making some sort of difference, as evidenced by the IRC above and
changes to the wiki. Following Ben's argument, all evidence
suggests my
opposition is working.
On 2/2/07, David Janes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/2/07, Joe Andrieu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to be clear here. This is not about a witch hunt or empty
rebellion. The leadership has NO external checks and balances. Even the
most private non-profit organization in the united states
* http://microformats.org/wiki/faq#Q:_Who_controls_microformats.3F
* http://microformats.org/wiki/issues#Governance_Issues
I would also like to revive the idea of a meta-discuss list to
handle governance and other non-technical issues. This appears to be
off-topic for the current wiki page on
On 02/02/07, Scott Reynen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't believe anyone has said they are only willing to participate
in the -admin list secretly. But a few haven't said anything at all,
I assume because they're busy people. I expect they'll be happy to
add their names to the public
On 2/2/07, Martin Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 02/02/07, Scott Reynen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't believe anyone has said they are only willing to participate
in the -admin list secretly. But a few haven't said anything at all,
I assume because they're busy people. I expect
Andy,
(apologies for the tardiness, I'm in one of those old fashioned,
unconnected airomoplanes)
me self can't be anything but tautological; nor is it appropriate
when
referring to third parties. so:
in English, it is tautological. But restricting the words to their
roles in XFN and
Andy,
vCard has the property key - and so too does therefore hCard. vCard
defines key (more or less, no cnnection this moment to quote directly)
Specifies the public key or authentication certificate associated
with the entity the vcard represents
thanks
j
On 31/01/2007, at 8:41 AM,
On 2/1/07, John Allsopp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
vCard has the property key - and so too does therefore hCard. vCard
defines key (more or less, no cnnection this moment to quote directly)
Specifies the public key or authentication certificate associated
with the entity the vcard represents
So
Brian Suda wrote:
I get the feeling you want both the rel-tag and bookmark spiders to
index it in the
exact same way? At the moment this is NOT how rel-tag works.
Do you have a specific use-case or URL you want us to look at?
otherwise we should stay away from hypothetical what ifs.
No, I
Hi all,
Just pulling this out to a new thread, since it's a bit buried and
confusing where it was.
I'm pretty sure I'm doing the right thing here:
- the last path component [1]
- ignore trailing slashes [2]
...
Personally, but not off topic, when I create web pages I prefer never
to show
On Feb 2, 2007, at 11:13 AM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
I may be rare, but it does happen. Mein Kampf in English is still
titled Mein Kampf
So if the evidence confirms my suspicion that it's really rare to
need
to mark up the language of (for example) the book separately from the
language of the
27 matches
Mail list logo
