On 06/03/07, Scott Reynen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 6, 2007, at 10:09 AM, Kevin Marks wrote:
Let me clarify that - Danny's 'ceci n'est pas une pipe' example is
clearly not 80%.
I think 80% is irrelevant here because it's not even the same
problem. Profile URIs solve the problem of
On 06/03/07, Kevin Marks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 5, 2007, at 3:31 AM, Danny Ayers wrote:
Thought this might be useful:
http://dannyayers.com/misc/microformats/soupdragon
http://epeus.blogspot.com/2007/03/hot-news-people-lie.html
As Scott points out, this is missing the point.
On Mar 7, 2007, at 1:51 AM, Danny Ayers wrote:
There I disagree - as far as the theory goes, for microformats the
problem is effectively solved.
The notion of profile URIs has gone through the community process, and
there's even a microformat to support them: XMDP. It's been accepted
that each
On 07.03.2007, at 00:37, Tantek Çelik wrote:
Question: would the community be ok with a draft approximate
property list
for hCalendar sooner than a comprehensive precise property list later?
Personally I'd prefer a draft list that can be gradually improved
until it becomes
the final,
On 07/03/07, Kevin Marks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, help make it so. We could declare an official URL and put your
soupdragon there, which would satisfy the opaque URL you want, but if
you made up an XMDP, that would be far better.
I'm not so concerned over the soup dragon, although it
On Mar 7, 2007, at 3:51 AM, Danny Ayers wrote:
We seem to be at the iterate stage now with the ambiguity problem,
There I disagree - as far as the theory goes, for microformats the
problem is effectively solved.
I'd say the problem isn't solved until the solution is actually
adopted, and
Everybody,
ss Frances suggested, I restarted the discussion in microformats-new.
Please, join me and if necessary, repeat what you have said so far.
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-new
Thanks!
Marian
___
microformats-discuss
http://microformats.org/wiki/to-do#hCalendar_2
Question: would the community be ok with a draft approximate
property list
for hCalendar sooner than a comprehensive precise property list later?
Apologizing in advance for not following any (possibly) existing
volunteer procedure, I've done
On 07/03/07, Alexander Graf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 07.03.2007, at 00:37, Tantek Çelik wrote:
Question: would the community be ok with a draft approximate
property list
for hCalendar sooner than a comprehensive precise property list later?
Personally I'd prefer a draft list that can be
