Thanks Maciej,
HTML5 does have new elements, some of which are mainly for semantic
purposes, but it does not at present have a copyright element.
my bad, no idea where I got that idea from!
The current proposal does have a predefined copyright class though.
That would be it then.
The
Better than a[name] would be a[href], assuming a relevent URI scheme exists:
a href=geo:51.36,-0.05London, abbr title=United KingomUK/abbr/a
(See: http://geouri.org/)
Disadvantages would be:
1. Involves using a poorly supported URI scheme. People using browsers
that don't support the scheme
On May 11, 2007, at 3:15 PM, John Allsopp wrote:
(abbr pattern problems,
Clearly, there's a need for markup for the generic pattern of marking
up a triple of data presented to humans, the microformat class and a
normalized easy-to-parse representation of the data. HTML5 time
addresses
Toby Inkster wrote:
Better than a[name] would be a[href], assuming a relevent URI scheme exists:
a href=geo:51.36,-0.05London, abbr title=United KingomUK/abbr/a
(See: http://geouri.org/)
Disadvantages would be:
1. Involves using a poorly supported URI scheme. People using browsers
that don't
On Mar 10, 2007, at 21:46, Henri Sivonen wrote:
I needed a .bib-based bibliography generator for XHTML, so I wrote
one with help from a friend who had developed a .bib parser.
In case others are interested, I've published the source code.
There's no documentation to speak of.
On 5/11/07, Ryan King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 11, 2007, at 12:13 AM, Ben Buchanan wrote:
And for the really geeky, we have a surprise: Twitter now fully
supports microformats. Now that is pretty geektastic.
How 'bout that! But what does that mean?
Hmm, well it looks like all the
On May 13, 2007, at 7:49 PM, Chris Messina wrote:
XFN. All of the side bars use [rel=contact].
-ryan
So yeah, it's hAtom + hCard + XFN. Pretty good, especially since we
haven't seen too much hAtom pickup outside of a few WordPress blogs.
Also rel=me on the URL links in personal pages,
On 5/7/07, Keith Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm of the opinion that Semantic HTML is a perfectly fine term for
Semantic HTML, and I'm a little sceptical of the utility of a new
acronym for it. If there's a problem with people still not understanding
semantic html, either the arguments
On 5/13/07, Chris Messina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It isn't that the arguments aren't clear enough or loudly enough;
we've had a good 4-5 years of tooting the proverbial semantic horn.
The problem is that, in a lesser amount of time, microformats have
totally taken off and captured people's
