On 9 Oct 2007, at 00:57, Brian Miller wrote:
In looking at the hreview examples (apple, readandtravel) who have a
similar structure, they usually repeat the item information in each
review and use css to hide it. This seems messy from a semantic and
accessibility point of view. Most
Hey hey,
Quick question for people publishing hReview.
Long ago when the OBJECT-include pattern was first raised, there was
a bug in Safari that made it unworkable. That bug got fixed.
However, there appears to be a separate, very serious browser issue
whereby browsers are making
I've swapped for the hyperlink include pattern (however, repeating
the review item name as the InnerText of the anchor, so as not to
create poorly accessible empty anchors).
+1
My feeling is that the Wiki content on the include pattern needs a
tidy anyway, but if this issue with firing
Thanks Dimitry your suggestion fixed it!
I still see problems with multiple-words family-names given-names in Operator.
ciao
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
Hey all,
I need to do a presentation on the semantic Web and all the articles I
read about it talks about RDF and usually show this schema:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:W3c-semantic-web-layers.svg
Could anyone please tell me what's the relation between the semantic
web and microformats,
http://www.tantek.com/presentations/2004etech/realworldsemanticspres.html
On 10/9/07, Patrick Aljord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all,
I need to do a presentation on the semantic Web and all the articles I
read about it talks about RDF and usually show this schema:
On 10/9/07, Patrick Aljord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all,
I need to do a presentation on the semantic Web and all the articles I
read about it talks about RDF and usually show this schema:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:W3c-semantic-web-layers.svg
Could anyone please tell me what's
Great, so I can use the object. So back to the original question: Can
the item information be separate from the first review and just included
in the first review using object? If yes, then does that item
information need to be wrapped in hreview?
Any tools to test and validate?
Brian Miller
On 9 Oct 2007, at 18:39, Brian Miller wrote:
Great, so I can use the object. So back to the original question: Can
the item information be separate from the first review and just
included
in the first review using object? If yes, then does that item
information need to be wrapped in
On Oct 9, 2007 10:27 AM, Tom Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The microformats community works on the basis of having the data
embedded into the HTML. The RDF/SemWeb approach looks to have a
consistent data model, and then having as many representations as you
like of that data model. The data
If you could out a testcase up, that would be great.
Thanks
Mike
On 10/9/07, LucaP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Dimitry your suggestion fixed it!
I still see problems with multiple-words family-names given-names in
Operator.
ciao
___
Thank you all Tom and everybody for your great answers, keep them going :)
On 10/9/07, Kevin Marks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's a little spurious, Tom - the issue is not parsing it, it's
translating the parsed results into something that has meaning to a
human. That you can express things
On 10/9/07, Andy Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.tantek.com/presentations/2004etech/realworldsemanticspres.html
thanx for the link, I remember of another presentation of tantek çelik
that was about using your website as an API, it looked a bit like that
one but more recent maybe.
On 10/10/07, Patrick Aljord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thanx for the link, I remember of another presentation of tantek çelik
that was about using your website as an API, it looked a bit like that
one but more recent maybe. Any idea where I could find it?
found it :)
On 10/10/07, Patrick Aljord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/10/07, Patrick Aljord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thanx for the link, I remember of another presentation of tantek çelik
that was about using your website as an API, it looked a bit like that
one but more recent maybe. Any idea where I
Note that is more then 2 years after the original 'can your site be
your API?' presentation by me and Tantek... great to see these ideas
spread out.
Drew's slides are much prettier though... and he cites 'fork handles'
http://epeus.blogspot.com/2007/07/end-homographophobia-now.html
On Oct 9,
My feeling is that the Wiki content on the include pattern needs a
tidy anyway, but if this issue with firing unwanted requests is
unfixable, I think we should restructure to promote the hyperlink-
include as the first-choice solution.
I would agree with that... even here such extra unecessary
17 matches
Mail list logo
