According to [1] it's fine sticking rel attribute in link elements so
I don't see why not, generally. But read on.
I would even extend the question why not adding rev=me since that
url should be mine as well but,this [2] proved me wrong..
[1]
On 10/12/07, Manu Sporny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great! Where are they? Are the transformations only available as XSL
stylesheets? If so, they're not very useful as a quick-reference for
publishers... are they?
Brian is referring to the RDFa folks rewriting microformats in RDFa, which
seems
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Tom
Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Brian is referring to the RDFa folks rewriting microformats in RDFa,
which seems like a non-optimal route to take - it's much better to
publish microformats in the microformat syntax, and then use the
profile attribute to
On 10/13/07, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And for those of us who publish HTML4.01, not XHTML..?
Well, those implementing the GRDDL standard MAY use Tidy or a similar HTML
parsing library to turn HTML 4 in to XHTML 1.0, then parse XHTML 1.0 using
XSLT. The HTML 5 people also have
On Oct 13, 2007, at 3:36 AM, Tom Morris wrote:
Publishing microformats as
RDFa seems like a terrific way to ensure that only RDFa tools can
read them.
There is no technical reason RDF couldn't be converted into
microformats just as easily as microformats are converted into RDF.
Let's
I have split the wiki page implementors:
http://microformats.org/wiki/implementors
from the existing, over-long implementations page:
http://microformats.org/wiki/implementations
Each may need some tweaking.
--
Andy Mabbett
___
