[uf-discuss] [ANN:] Hypertext Friend of a Friend (hFoaF)

2008-05-14 Thread Martin McEvoy
Hello all, I am Pleased to announce Hypertext Friend of a Friend or hFoaF. hFoaF came to be because I noticed a patten of people trying to consolidate their identity's, express interests, and friends in their user profiles and homepages using hcard[1] and a url with the XFN[2] rel=me, marking up

Re: [uf-discuss] [ANN:] Hypertext Friend of a Friend (hFoaF)

2008-05-14 Thread André Luís
I just tried on my own blog, without any changes to the current markup: http://xml.mfd-consult.dk/foaf/explorer/?foaf=http%3A%2F%2Fweborganics.co.uk%2FhFoaF%2F%3Fid%3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Fandr3.net%2Fblog It worked pretty well!! (I'm using xFolk to mark up the blog entries, but I'm considering changing

Re: [uf-discuss] [ANN:] Hypertext Friend of a Friend (hFoaF)

2008-05-14 Thread Martin McEvoy
Hello André On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 12:10 +0100, André Luís wrote: I just tried on my own blog, without any changes to the current markup: http://xml.mfd-consult.dk/foaf/explorer/?foaf=http%3A%2F% 2Fweborganics.co.uk%2FhFoaF%2F%3Fid%3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Fandr3.net%2Fblog It worked pretty well!!

Re: [uf-discuss] [ANN:] Hypertext Friend of a Friend (hFoaF)

2008-05-14 Thread Martin McEvoy
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 12:10 +0100, André Luís wrote: I like the idea... basically you're just suggesting a way of putting hcard+xfn+(hatom/xfolk) together in a simple way. Having a specific format to aim for (and to call it) will surely help convergence in implementations. Yes I guess that's

Re: [uf-discuss] [ANN:] Hypertext Friend of a Friend (hFoaF)

2008-05-14 Thread André Luís
Ok just to clear it up, are you actually suggesting a new format? or are you suggesting a best-practice for publishers to implement these formats in such a way as to enable a more complete conversion to FOAF? -- André Luís On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Martin McEvoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [uf-discuss] [ANN:] Hypertext Friend of a Friend (hFoaF)

2008-05-14 Thread Martin McEvoy
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 20:57 +0100, André Luís wrote: Ok just to clear it up, are you actually suggesting a new format? or are you suggesting a best-practice for publishers to implement these formats in such a way as to enable a more complete conversion to FOAF? Im not sure yet there are