Re: [uf-discuss] Author in hAtom

2009-02-27 Thread André Luís
Edward, My gut also told me this was valid. I even implemented hatom this way in my blog. After I read this thread, I went to check and lo and behold... Operator transforms the author part of hatom into this: object author { 0=posted by André Luís } Which is not what I wanted. I have

Re: [uf-discuss] Author in hAtom

2009-02-27 Thread Jeremy Keith
Ted wrote: Yup, it's perfectly valid. André wrote: My gut also told me this was valid. I even implemented hatom this way in my blog. Good stuff. After I read this thread, I went to check and lo and behold... Operator transforms the author part of hatom into this: object author {

Re: [uf-discuss] Author in hAtom

2009-02-27 Thread Jeremy Keith
David wrote: Is this not though, just a general property of microformats in general? I.e. that the semantic information is being encoded at the property level and bundled at the the h* level. Yes. But with all the examples on the hAtom examples page, that isn't clear (for the hCard bit) so I

Re: [uf-discuss] Author in hAtom

2009-02-26 Thread David Janes
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Jeremy Keith jer...@adactio.com wrote: I have a question about the author property in hAtom... The spec says that author is modelled on the Atom AUTHOR element ( http://atomenabled.org/developers/syndication/#requiredFeedElements ) and must be encoded as an

[uf-discuss] Author in hAtom

2009-02-26 Thread Jeremy Keith
I have a question about the author property in hAtom... The spec says that author is modelled on the Atom AUTHOR element ( http://atomenabled.org/developers/syndication/#requiredFeedElements ) and must be encoded as an hCard. Now, here's an example of a perfectly valid hCard: p

Re: [uf-discuss] Author in hAtom

2009-02-26 Thread Edward O'Connor
Now, here's an example of a perfectly valid hCard: p class=vcardHello, my name is span class=fnJeremy Keith/span./p So my question is: is this valid for hAtom?: p class=author vcardHello, my name is span class=fnJeremy Keith/span./p Yup, it's perfectly valid.