Ryan Cannon wrote: > If the community is slow to develop a format that makes > sense, we often encourage authors to develop their own > systems, which then can inform how a format will function in > the wild. This is where documentation and the oft-belabored > "process" becomes powerful. Although it can be annoying for > early-adopters and people who need solutions now, it creates > strong formats once the issues are solidified.
Arrgghhh! (he says, frustrated that people address the tangent to his issue, but don't/won't address his actual issue!) So I repeat: How then can we achieve a disambiguation conventions to keep official Microformats from conflicting with "proto- Microformats?" -- -Mike Schinkel http://www.mikeschinkel.com/blogs/ http://www.welldesignedurls.org/ _______________________________________________ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
