Re: [uf-discuss] Google Code microformat?

2008-12-08 Thread Samuel Richter
I will try this again giving a scenario... Joe Cool, adept coder, releases a project, AlphaBUG, to the web on the code hosting site, www.attaboy.com. Every time Joe releases a new update, he also publishes an RSS/Atom article describing. The problem for Joe, who wants to empower AlphaBUG's

Re: [uf-discuss] Google Code microformat?

2008-11-28 Thread Samuel Richter
Dude, you are giving me a headache. On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 9:55 AM, David Janes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 9:09 AM, Samuel Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It seems to me that both hAtom and hDOAP present limitations of a sort when it comes to providing feeds for

[uf-discuss] Google Code microformat?

2008-11-22 Thread Samuel Richter
Please excuse me if this is not the appropriate mailing list or if this has already been discussed (the archives have no search feature.) It seems that Google Code is using some sort of microformat in their project feeds. I happened to look at the Atom source for a given project's update feed

[uf-discuss] Google Code microformat?

2008-11-22 Thread Toby A Inkster
If you're talking about their use of class=ot-logmessage etc, then no, that isn't a Microformat[1]. It looks to me like the reason those particular classes are present in the project updates Atom feed is that the feed is generated by the same code that generates the project updates HTML

Re: [uf-discuss] Google Code microformat?

2008-11-22 Thread Samuel Richter
It seems to me that both hAtom and hDOAP present limitations of a sort when it comes to providing feeds for software updates. On the one hand with hAtom, you have a generic microformat with no way of identifying any content beyond it merely being feed content and with hDOAP, you have no mechanism

Re: [uf-discuss] Google Code microformat?

2008-11-22 Thread David Janes
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 9:09 AM, Samuel Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It seems to me that both hAtom and hDOAP present limitations of a sort when it comes to providing feeds for software updates. On the one hand with hAtom, you have a generic microformat with no way of identifying any

Re: [uf-discuss] Google Code microformat?

2008-11-22 Thread Scott Reynen
On [Nov 22], at [ Nov 22] 7:09 , Samuel Richter wrote: It seems to me that both hAtom and hDOAP present limitations of a sort when it comes to providing feeds for software updates. On the one hand with hAtom, you have a generic microformat with no way of identifying any content beyond it