To: Microformats Discuss
Subject: Re: [uf-discuss] Microformats vs. CalDAV?
On Oct 19, 2006, at 8:18 PM, Mike Schinkel wrote:
P.S. Also, I think a great addition to the FAQ would be to list of
standard like vCard and CalDAV etc. and give arguments for why
Microformats should be considering
: Friday, October 20, 2006 12:00 AM
To: Microformats Discuss
Subject: Re: [uf-discuss] Microformats vs. CalDAV?
On Oct 19, 2006, at 8:18 PM, Mike Schinkel wrote:
The good news is Apple in on our board, which means CalDAV would
be the standard we'd employ.
CalDEV: http
.
-Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin
Marks
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 12:00 AM
To: Microformats Discuss
Subject: Re: [uf-discuss] Microformats vs. CalDAV?
On Oct 19, 2006, at 8:18 PM, Mike Schinkel wrote:
The good news
On Oct 19, 2006, at 8:18 PM, Mike Schinkel wrote:
P.S. Also, I think a great addition to the FAQ would be to list of
standard like vCard and CalDAV etc. and give arguments for why
Microformats should be considering in parallel as opposed to an
alternate. Tantek explained these things in
Hi all:
I was just emailing with someone who's company offers software as a service
and I was encouraging him to adopt Microformats including hCard and
hCalendar. His response to me was:
The good news is Apple in on our board, which means CalDAV would be the
standard we'd employ.
CalDEV:
I was just emailing with someone who's company offers software as a
service
and I was encouraging him to adopt Microformats including hCard and
hCalendar. His response to me was:
The good news is Apple in on our board, which means CalDAV would be
the
standard we'd employ.
CalDEV:
On Oct 19, 2006, at 8:18 PM, Mike Schinkel wrote:
The good news is Apple in on our board, which means CalDAV would
be the
standard we'd employ.
CalDEV: http://ietf.osafoundation.org/caldav/
Now, it's my understanding that one of the benefits of Microformats is
that
it co-exists nicely
