Forgot another vote:
I don't think microformats for user actions, like vote, email, comment
are in the spirit of current microformats.
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 12:46 -0700, Kevin Marks wrote:
They are links that express votes - if you can suggest clarifications
to the text of the microformat page that make this clearer that would
be appreciated.
I think clarifying VoteLinks is a task that goes beyond my abilities.
But this
On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 18:17 -0300, Bruno Barberi Gnecco wrote:
We are using vote-links extensively in our new site (likeorhate.com)
And doing so wrongly. VoteLinks are a badly named microformat. They are
*not* for polling. They are for linking to articles about stuff you like
or dislike.
e.g.
On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 18:17 -0300, Bruno Barberi Gnecco wrote:
We are using vote-links extensively in our new site (likeorhate.com)
And doing so wrongly. VoteLinks are a badly named microformat. They are
*not* for polling. They are for linking to articles about stuff you like
or dislike.
e.g.
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Bruno Barberi Gnecco
br...@likeorhate.com wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 18:17 -0300, Bruno Barberi Gnecco wrote:
We are using vote-links extensively in our new site (likeorhate.com)
And doing so wrongly. VoteLinks are a badly named microformat. They are
*not*
Association is a problem with other Microformats as well. I had similar problem
with hreviews, and interestingly proposed the exact solution that you did,
container association: Items inside a container belong to it, similar to RDF.
In your example the div is the container. It should be
