http://cafe.elharo.com/xml/must-ignore-vs-microformats
A friend of mine showed me this today. Macroformats, over Microformats.
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
On 19 Jul 2006, at 17:14, Jesse Rodgers wrote:
On 7/19/06, Frances Berriman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://cafe.elharo.com/xml/must-ignore-vs-microformats
A friend of mine showed me this today. Macroformats, over
Microformats.
I always thought microformats was semantics for everyone and
Thanks for the response, and the advice.
Frances
Tantek Çelik wrote:
On 7/19/06 8:37 AM, Frances Berriman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://cafe.elharo.com/xml/must-ignore-vs-microformats
A friend of mine showed me this today. Macroformats, over Microformats.
The article is
On 19 Jul 2006, at 18:55, Tantek Çelik wrote:
On 7/19/06 10:34 AM, Charles Iliya Krempeaux
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
(I even have a PHP parser written that makes parsing Microformats and
other kinds of semantic HTML dead easy... coming to you via LGPL
eventually... once I improve the
On Jul 19, 2006, at 10:55 AM, Tantek Çelik wrote:
On 7/19/06 10:34 AM, Charles Iliya Krempeaux
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
One good thing about XML, IMO, is that for certain simple markups
based on XML, it's easier for a beginner-level or intermediate-level
developer to write a parser for it (as
