Fwd: [uf-discuss] RE: Disconnect between hCard and RFC 2426 (vCard specification)?

2006-10-23 Thread Stephen Paul Weber
1:1 means that the field names are identical in each, not that the use-case will always be the same. (Incidentally, I have seen vCards made for businesses before...) On 10/22/06, Brian Suda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/22/06, Costello, Roger L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Folks, I am

Re: [uf-discuss] RE: Disconnect between hCard and RFC 2426 (vCard specification)?

2006-10-23 Thread Kevin Marks
On Oct 23, 2006, at 5:30 AM, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: 1:1 means that the field names are identical in each, not that the use-case will always be the same. (Incidentally, I have seen vCards made for businesses before...) Quite - microformats are based on observing usage, not on theory.

[uf-discuss] RE: Disconnect between hCard and RFC 2426 (vCard specification)?

2006-10-22 Thread Costello, Roger L.
Hi Folks, I sent this message a couple days ago and got no response, so I am resending. Does anyone have thoughts on the issue I raised? /Roger -Original Message- From: Costello, Roger L. Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 12:02 PM To: microformats-discuss@microformats.org Subject:

Re: [uf-discuss] RE: Disconnect between hCard and RFC 2426 (vCard specification)?

2006-10-22 Thread Brian Suda
On 10/22/06, Costello, Roger L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Folks, I am reading the vCard specification (RFC 2426) and there seems to be some disconnects between it and the hCard specification. Terminology RFC 2426 uses the terminology type, e.g., FN Type hCard uses the terminology